2022
DOI: 10.1108/ijqrm-09-2021-0327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of diabetes-related awareness instrument (DRAI) to measure diabetics awareness towards risk factors and prevention strategies

Abstract: PurposeAccessibility to a precise tool for healthcare management and self-precaution among diabetic patients is an absolute necessity. This paper aims to develop and validate diabetes-related awareness instrument (DRAI) – an instrument that measures diabetics awareness about risk factors and prevention strategies.Design/methodology/approachThe reliability and validity of the DRAI were tested with a sample of 112 diabetics. The construct validity of the DRAI was measured using exploratory and confirmatory facto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A four-stage procedure for developing the study questionnaire was followed (1) designing and composition of the instrument (2) modification of items (3) testing of psychometric traits (4) reliability test. A detailed procedure for developing and adapting the study questionnaire can be found in a related research article [6]. The final draft of the questionnaire was corrected based on the feedback given by a diabetologist and a panel of five academicians.…”
Section: Questionnaire Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A four-stage procedure for developing the study questionnaire was followed (1) designing and composition of the instrument (2) modification of items (3) testing of psychometric traits (4) reliability test. A detailed procedure for developing and adapting the study questionnaire can be found in a related research article [6]. The final draft of the questionnaire was corrected based on the feedback given by a diabetologist and a panel of five academicians.…”
Section: Questionnaire Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diabetes alone engendered healthcare expenditure of US$760 billion in 2019 and 79% of diagnosed individuals are natives of low and middle-income economies. The healthcare system of such economies is not endowed to handle the escalating menace of diabetes [5,6]. A mammoth amount of $294.5 billion is alone spent by the United States of America in a year on patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus and associated complications, which is the largest in the world, followed by the Republic of China [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wards were then chosen using the probability proportional to size (PPS) technique from each selected town or city, and one enumeration block was selected from each sampling ward. Last but not least, households were selected from each enumeration block using the SRS without replacement technique, and one member of each household was selected for the survey using the Kish table technique (Kansra & Oberoi, 2021; Kish, 1949). Assuming 50% of pregnant women were food insecure, the 384-person sample size was computed using the margin of error, 95% confidence level, and 5% non-response rate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Content validity is the measurement of the representativeness of the scale content. 9,10 A panel of six experts was formed, in which four were medical practitioners who were regularly involved in healthcare delivery and two were an academicians who were proficient in research and statistical data analysis. The feedback along with specific remarks of the medical practitioners as well as the academicians were taken with the help of a standardised form of content validity as suggested in a study by the Yusoff.…”
Section: Content Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%