Validation of Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) –Spanish Version– for Screening Eating Disorders

Peláez-Fernández, María Ángeles; Labrador, Francisco J.; Raich, Rosa M.

doi:10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n2.38893

Cited by 38 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, there are effective screening and diagnostic tools, which can be used to identify patients with BED, that have been tested in other patient populations. While this review focuses exclusively on studies conducted in English, it is of note that the following tools have been translated into numerous languages including: Arabic, 57,58 Chinese, [59][60][61] Fijian, 62 Finnish, 63,64 French, 65,66 German, 67 Greek, 68 Italian, 69 Lithuanian, 70 Malay, 71 Portuguese, 72 Spanish, [73][74][75][76] and Turkish. 77,78 Brief Screening…”

Section: Screening and Diagnosismentioning

confidence: 99%

<p>Binge Eating Disorder in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Diagnostic and Management Challenges</p>

Chevinsky¹,

Wadden²,

Chao³

2020

DMSO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with an increased risk of disordered eating behaviors including binge eating disorder (BED). Comorbid BED in patients with T2DM has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes such as higher body mass index (BMI) and depressive symptoms. Identifying and addressing this disorder in patients with T2DM is a significant challenge for health-care providers. The purpose of this narrative review is to discuss current perspectives on BED in the context of T2DM with implications for screening and management of these highly comorbid conditions. BED continues to be underrecognized and underdiagnosed. However, there are established tools that providers can use to screen for BED such as the SCOFF Questionnaire and Questionnaire on Eating and Weight Patterns-5. There are several effective treatments for BED including cognitive behavioral therapy, interpersonal therapy, and lisdexamfetamine dimesylate. However, few studies have examined the effects of these treatments in patients with co-morbid T2DM and BED.

show abstract

Section: Screening and Diagnosismentioning

confidence: 99%

<p>Binge Eating Disorder in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Diagnostic and Management Challenges</p>

Chevinsky¹,

Wadden²,

Chao³

2020

DMSO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The EDE‐Q has undergone translation and validation in 14 languages, including Spanish (e.g., Peláez‐Fernández, Labrador, & Raich, 2012), Japanese (Mitsui, Yoshida, & Komaki, 2017), and Fijian (Becker et al, 2010). While the EDE‐Q has indicated satisfactory reliability and convergent validity across different languages and samples, most studies fail to replicate its original four‐factor structure (Rand‐Giovannetti, Cicero, Mond, & Latner, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adaptation and validation of the Eating Disorder Examination‐Questionnaire in English among urban Indian adolescents

Lewis‐Smith

Garbett

Chaudhry³

et al. 2020

Intl J Eating Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Eating pathology is a salient issue in India, with clinical features reported among adults and adolescents. However, there are currently no validated measures of disordered eating in the Indian context. The present study therefore aimed to validate a culturally appropriate English language version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE‐Q), a widely used measure, among adolescents in India. Method We adapted and examined the factor structure, reliability, and construct validity of the EDE‐Q among an urban sample of 1,413 Indian adolescents (mean age = 13 years; 45% girls). Results In contrast to the original four‐factor model, exploratory factor analysis identified a two‐factor solution for girls and boys, which was verified by confirmatory factor analysis; a “Preoccupation and Control” subscale and a “Weight and Shape Concerns” subscale. The total scale comprised 15 items for girls and 18 items for boys. Test–retest reliability and internal consistency were satisfactory for the girls' and boys' scales (Cronbach's α = .91 for both) and their comprising subscales (αs ≥ .80). Concurrent validity was established through medium‐high significant correlations with measures of body image and internalization of appearance ideals. Combining items common to both versions of the scale led to a psychometrically acceptable model which was largely invariant across both genders, thus facilitating gendered comparison. Discussion Findings indicate the reliability and validity of the EDE‐Q among English‐speaking urban Indian adolescents. This will facilitate further research examining the prevalence and nature of eating pathology among adolescents in India.

show abstract

“…The original version of the EDE‐Q 6.0 has been extensively studied, and its good psychometric properties have been globally demonstrated in Portuguese, Spanish, Japanese, Hebrew, Persian, Mexican, and others samples (Machado et al, ; Mahmoodi, Moloodi, & Ghaderi, ; Mitsui, Yoshida, & Komaki, ; Peláez‐Fernández, Labrador, & Raich, ; Unikel Santoncini et al, ; Zohar, Lev‐Ari, & Bachner‐Melman, ). In terms of reliability, some researchers have shown that the EDE‐Q 6.0 has good to strong internal consistency (Calugi et al, ; Giovazolias, Tsaousis, & Vallianatou, ; Mahmoodi et al, ; Yucel et al, ), test‐retest reliability (Calugi et al, ; Yucel et al, ), an adequate convergent validity (Giovazolias et al, ; Mahmoodi et al, ; Peláez‐Fernández et al, ; Zohar et al, ), divergent validity (Giovazolias et al, ; Mahmoodi et al, ; Zohar et al, ), and criterion‐oriented validity (Calugi et al, ; Yucel et al, ). Several studies have verified the sensitivity and specificity of the EDE‐Q 6.0 (Peláez‐Fernández et al, ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In terms of reliability, some researchers have shown that the EDE‐Q 6.0 has good to strong internal consistency (Calugi et al, ; Giovazolias, Tsaousis, & Vallianatou, ; Mahmoodi et al, ; Yucel et al, ), test‐retest reliability (Calugi et al, ; Yucel et al, ), an adequate convergent validity (Giovazolias et al, ; Mahmoodi et al, ; Peláez‐Fernández et al, ; Zohar et al, ), divergent validity (Giovazolias et al, ; Mahmoodi et al, ; Zohar et al, ), and criterion‐oriented validity (Calugi et al, ; Yucel et al, ). Several studies have verified the sensitivity and specificity of the EDE‐Q 6.0 (Peláez‐Fernández et al, ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the Lithuanian version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire 6.0 in a student sample

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Objectives The Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire 6.0 (EDE‐Q 6.0) is one of the most broadly used self‐report tools that assesses attitudes and behaviors associated with eating disorders (EDs). The aim of the present study was to examine the reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Lithuanian version of the EDE‐Q 6.0 (LT‐EDE‐Q 6.0) in a nonclinical student sample. Materials and Methods A sample of 382 students (mean age 24.0 ± 6.4) participated in the study. The students completed a self‐report questionnaire measuring the risk of EDs (LT‐EDE‐Q 6.0), body image (LT‐MBSRQ‐AS), quality of life (LT‐WHOQOL‐BREF), and self‐esteem (RSES). Cronbach's alpha assessed the internal consistency of the EDE‐Q 6.0. Pearson's correlations were used for the analyses of the construct and concurrent validity with the subscales of LT‐MBSRQ‐AS, LT‐WHOQOL‐BREF, and RSES. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for assessing test‐retest reliability. Results The mean score of the LT‐EDE‐Q 6.0 in the mixed sample was 1.5 ± 1.02. For women and men, the general mean scores were higher than in the majority of the samples of Western Europe but lower than in the United States. Acceptable internal consistency for the four subscales (0.75–0.88) and the LT‐EDE‐Q 6.0 general score (0.94) was obtained. Test‐retest reliability was good to excellent for all subscales (0.66–0.91) and for the items that assessed essential behavioral features of EDs (0.84–0.90, except item 14 ICC = 0.4). The LT‐EDE‐Q 6.0 scores had adequate concurrent validity. However, the original 4‐factor structure or other proposed models of EDE‐Q were not obtained by CFA. Conclusions The results of the current study support the applicability, validity, and reliability of the LT‐EDE‐Q 6.0 in a nonclinical Lithuanian student sample. However, we recommend assessing the general scale score without the application of the subscales. The Lithuanian version of this instrument should be further investigated with clinical samples to identify clinically diagnosed cases.

show abstract

Validation of Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) –Spanish Version– for Screening Eating Disorders

Cited by 38 publications

References 21 publications

<p>Binge Eating Disorder in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Diagnostic and Management Challenges</p>

<p>Binge Eating Disorder in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Diagnostic and Management Challenges</p>

Adaptation and validation of the Eating Disorder Examination‐Questionnaire in English among urban Indian adolescents

Validation of the Lithuanian version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire 6.0 in a student sample

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About