1992
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/56.1.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of estimates of energy intake by weighed dietary record and diet history in children and adolescents

Abstract: Energy intakes assessed by 7-d weighted dietary records (EI-WDRs) and diet histories (EI-DHs) were compared with concurrent estimates of total energy expenditure (TEE) by the doubly labeled water method in 78 subjects aged 3-18 y. EI-WDRs were not obtained from the 3- and 5-y-old subjects. EI-WDRs in the 7- and 9-y-old children were 108 +/- 25% (n = 12) and 97 +/- 15% (n = 12), respectively, of corresponding TEE values showing good agreement. However in the 12-, 15-, and 18-y-old subjects EI-WDR averaged 89 +/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

20
276
6
9

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 353 publications
(311 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
20
276
6
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to other studies involving children in Canada, the United States and Europe, total EI was greater for boys than for girls in the present study (38)(39)(40) . The lack of differences in EI by age group could be partially explained by the greater under-reporting in the 14-18-year-olds (EI:BMR 5 1?2 (SD 0?6) than in the younger children (EI:BMR 5 1?4 (SD 0?6).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to other studies involving children in Canada, the United States and Europe, total EI was greater for boys than for girls in the present study (38)(39)(40) . The lack of differences in EI by age group could be partially explained by the greater under-reporting in the 14-18-year-olds (EI:BMR 5 1?2 (SD 0?6) than in the younger children (EI:BMR 5 1?4 (SD 0?6).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The lack of differences in EI by age group could be partially explained by the greater under-reporting in the 14-18-year-olds (EI:BMR 5 1?2 (SD 0?6) than in the younger children (EI:BMR 5 1?4 (SD 0?6). Similarly, Livingstone et al (39) found a divergence between the reported EI and total energy expenditure measured by doubly labelled water as age increased. .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, in a study by Prentice et al (1989), the energy intake measured with a 7 day weighted dietary records overestimated the energy expenditure measured with DLW in 14 geriatric patients. Similar ®ndings were noted for children when their intake was reported by their parents ( Livingstone et al, 1992). We also noted an overestimation of energy intake using the dietary record Table 6 Total water intake a (WI) and labeled water estimated water loss (WI) and in¯uence of body weight (BW) (n 31).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Energy intakes were calculated as described above. Details of each dietary methodology are fully documented in the source references (Livingstone et al, 1990b(Livingstone et al, , 1992b). …”
Section: Energy Intakementioning
confidence: 99%