2006
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2006.872529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of global moderate-resolution LAI products: a framework proposed within the CEOS land product validation subgroup

Abstract: Initiated in 1984, the Committee Earth Observing Satellites' Working Group on Calibration and Validation (CEOS WGCV) pursues activities to coordinate, standardize and advance calibration and validation of civilian satellites and their data. One subgroup of CEOS WGCV, Land Product Validation (LPV), was established in 2000 to define standard validation guidelines and protocols and to foster data and information exchange relevant to the validation of land products. Since then, a number of leaf area index (LAI) pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
265
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 367 publications
(272 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
5
265
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows for the combination of current data with flux tower measurements. Field measurements were carried out on various spatial scales by applying the concept of elementary sampling units (ESUs; Morisette et al, 2006). Up to three ESUs were established for each crop type to investigate spatial heterogeneity on the scale of acreages.…”
Section: Measurement Design Of the Field Campaignsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This allows for the combination of current data with flux tower measurements. Field measurements were carried out on various spatial scales by applying the concept of elementary sampling units (ESUs; Morisette et al, 2006). Up to three ESUs were established for each crop type to investigate spatial heterogeneity on the scale of acreages.…”
Section: Measurement Design Of the Field Campaignsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PAI was ascertained in two different ways: (1) with the LAI-2200 Plant Canopy Analyzer (LAI-2200; LI-COR Biosciences, Inc.) and (2) based on digital hemispherical photos (DHPs). Both methods rely on the determination of the gap fraction (Ross, 1981), permit repetitive non-destructive measurements (Morisette et al, 2006), and were deployed complementarily. While PAI values obtained from the LAI-2200 method are available on the scale of SSPs and ESUs, PAI values derived from DHPs are only provided for entire ESUs.…”
Section: Plant Area Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the retrieved LAI was evaluated according to the framework "validation of global moderate-resolution LAI products" proposed by CEOS WGCV ("Committee Earth Observing Satellites' Working Group on Calibration and Validation") [34] Landsat Thematic Mapper/Enhanced Thematic Mapper (TM/ETM) data acquired quasi-synchronously with the LAI observation dates were used in conjunction with measured LAI to generate the 30 m TM LAI maps. Then, these TM LAI maps were aggregated to 500 m resolution for evaluating the accuracy of inversed LAI using MODIS data [35,36].…”
Section: Data Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure that the true LAI values and the spectral images were simultaneously available, the direct evaluation procedure proposed by Zeng, et al [24] was adopted here (Figure 1). This procedure was based on the PROSAIL model with a "bottom-up" LAI product-validation process [14], and the simulated images had to be similar to the satellite images in the vegetation structure and growth seasonal cycle.…”
Section: Sampling Strategy Evaluation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground-based validation is critical for assessing the uncertainties and evaluating the accuracies of these satellite-derived products [10][11][12][13]. In the general "bottom-up" products validation framework, selection of the sampling strategy to define elementary sampling units (ESUs) for the entire site at the kilometer scale is an important step because the chosen sampling strategy results in different coefficients of the up-scaling function that ultimately affect the accuracy assessment of the LAI product [13][14][15]. The widely used random sampling or systematic sampling approaches in prior validation programs are simple and easy to carry out [16][17][18][19], but these approaches may not be appropriate over heterogeneous areas due to their low efficiency and the laborious and time-consuming nature of LAI field measurements [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%