2020
DOI: 10.1089/ham.2019.0097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Maximal, Submaximal, and Nonexercise Indirect V˙O2max Estimations at 2600 m Altitude

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Falgairrete et al 8 , carried out measurements between 300 to 3700 masl, affirming that SRT-20m underestimated VO 2 max obtained in the laboratory, but is more stable to predict physical condition in different ages. In the study proposed by Duperly et al 7 , where 64 young adults residing in the city of Bogota, Colombia, were evaluated, it was concluded that cardiorespiratory fitness can be estimated by the VO 2 max obtained in direct and indirect tests; however, within the field tests with greater validity, they point to the SRT-20m as the most suitable for determining VO 2 max in population living at high altitude, this being similar to what was reported by Ramírez et al 15 , who evaluated this same test in schoolchildren, finding closeness among the values reported by the SRT-20m compared to laboratory test data; however, these authors indicate the importance of applying a correction factor; in order to adjust aspects that at high altitudes become analysis variables such as: temperature, humidity, barometric pressure and physiological adaptations of subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Falgairrete et al 8 , carried out measurements between 300 to 3700 masl, affirming that SRT-20m underestimated VO 2 max obtained in the laboratory, but is more stable to predict physical condition in different ages. In the study proposed by Duperly et al 7 , where 64 young adults residing in the city of Bogota, Colombia, were evaluated, it was concluded that cardiorespiratory fitness can be estimated by the VO 2 max obtained in direct and indirect tests; however, within the field tests with greater validity, they point to the SRT-20m as the most suitable for determining VO 2 max in population living at high altitude, this being similar to what was reported by Ramírez et al 15 , who evaluated this same test in schoolchildren, finding closeness among the values reported by the SRT-20m compared to laboratory test data; however, these authors indicate the importance of applying a correction factor; in order to adjust aspects that at high altitudes become analysis variables such as: temperature, humidity, barometric pressure and physiological adaptations of subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physiological adaptations at moderate altitudes can potentially alter VO 2 max estimation when either field or laboratory tests are applied. Aspects such as the perception of maximum effort, central peripheral fatigue, and cognitive performance can lead to changes in pH, hemoglobin mass, and pulmonary hemodynamics 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cardiorespiratory fitness was assessed using the 20-metre multistage shuttle run test (20-MST), previously validated for the study population [ 31 ]. Students were required to walk or run between two lines 20 m apart at a pace announced by recorded tones at standard intervals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiorespiratory tness was assessed using the 20-metre multistage shuttle run test (20-MST), previously validated for the study population [30]. Students were required to walk or run between two lines 20 metres apart at a pace announced by recorded tones at standard intervals.…”
Section: Outcome Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%