2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of modified open field behaviour as a measure of trait anxiety in the dog

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies indicated that some dogs react to loud noise by decreasing activity, others with an increase in activity 45 . Besides the possible difference in active vs passive coping styles 45 , the diverging results of previous studies regarding changes in activity when dogs were exposed to noise recordings could possibly be explained by the novelty of the environment: In a novel environment (such as during open field tests 42,43 ), exploration would be expected in the beginning of the test. Consequentially, startling stimuli could be expected to inhibit exploration, and thus activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies indicated that some dogs react to loud noise by decreasing activity, others with an increase in activity 45 . Besides the possible difference in active vs passive coping styles 45 , the diverging results of previous studies regarding changes in activity when dogs were exposed to noise recordings could possibly be explained by the novelty of the environment: In a novel environment (such as during open field tests 42,43 ), exploration would be expected in the beginning of the test. Consequentially, startling stimuli could be expected to inhibit exploration, and thus activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Some experimental studies yielded conflicting behavioural results, reporting either a reduction in activity 41 , 42 or an increase in activity 43 45 in response to audio recordings of thunderstorms or fireworks. These different findings could potentially be explained by different coping strategies of dogs when exposed to fear-inducing noises, an active and a passive response: Landsberg et al 45 used separate scores for active (including aimless, repetitive or stereotypic pacing, running or circling; retreating to a hide, digging, climbing, jumping or barking) and passive (encompassing decreased activity, freezing against a wall, staying close to the door, crouching, tail between legs, ears back, panting, trembling, being alert/tense/vigilant, salivating, yawning, lip licking, lifting a foreleg and whining) responses to audio stimulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In dogs, diagnoses of fear- and anxiety-related behaviors and cognitive dysfunction are as complicated as in humans and the gold standards have not been established. Therefore, history taking and completion of validated questionnaires by dog owners as well as the performance of dog behavioral tests or observations and behavioral development assessments are used in combination as diagnostic procedures ( 84 , 85 ). In the present study, only validated online questionnaires were used to evaluate the behavioral comorbidities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed anxiolytic activity also in dogs in a provoked open field sound-induced fear model, where reactions to noises were elicited by a sound recording of thunderstorms. While tests like these are considered to have a good test–retest reliability, the generalizability to patients relating to changes in locomotion and exploratory behavior observed under anxiolytic treatment underlies the general limitations of a model ( Wormald et al, 2016 ). We observed an increase in locomotion measured in distance traveled after imepitoin treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not a surprising result as dexmedetomidine, and other α2-adrenoceptor agonists, are widely used as premedication to induce anesthesia ( Beckman, 2013 ) and sedative effects were already described for transmucosal administration in dogs ( Cohen and Bennett, 2015 ). For comparison, the effect of benzodiazepines in this model is associated with an increase in exploratory behavior, which is also measured as increase in total distance traveled ( Wormald et al, 2016 ). Due to the highly controlled conditions, the changes in behavior in the imepitoin or dexmedetomidine groups compared to baseline are most plausibly explained by the treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%