2008
DOI: 10.5194/acp-8-5801-2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of NO<sub>2</sub> and NO from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE)

Abstract: Abstract. Vertical profiles of NO 2 and NO have been obtained from solar occultation measurements by the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE), using an infrared Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS) and (for NO 2 ) an ultraviolet-visible-near-infrared spectrometer, MAESTRO (Measurement of Aerosol Extinction in the Stratosphere and Troposphere Retrieved by Occultation). In this paper, the quality of the ACE-FTS version 2.2 NO 2 and NO and the MAESTRO version 1.2 NO 2 data are assessed using other solar occ… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
64
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
8
64
3
Order By: Relevance
“…During day, NO 2 reacts rapidly to reform NO either by reaction with atomic oxygen (upper stratosphere) or photolysis: Wetzel et al, 2007;Kerzenmacher et al, 2008;Wolff et al, 2008). In this paper we focus on Arctic stratospheric mixing ratios of chlorine and nitrogen species which change quickly their concentration around the terminator between night and day.…”
Section: G Wetzel Et Al: Diurnal Variations Of Reactive Chlorine Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During day, NO 2 reacts rapidly to reform NO either by reaction with atomic oxygen (upper stratosphere) or photolysis: Wetzel et al, 2007;Kerzenmacher et al, 2008;Wolff et al, 2008). In this paper we focus on Arctic stratospheric mixing ratios of chlorine and nitrogen species which change quickly their concentration around the terminator between night and day.…”
Section: G Wetzel Et Al: Diurnal Variations Of Reactive Chlorine Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From comparisons with other satellite instrument we can mention, for example, the extensive ACE validation study in Dupuy et al (2009) and the GOMOS-MIPAS comparison including also mesospheric altitudes in . GOMOS NO 2 measurements have been compared with HALOE in Hauchecorne et al (2005), with MIPAS in Verronen et al (2009) and with ACE-FTS in Kerzenmacher et al (2008). For NO 3 we have validation with a balloon borne instrument in Renard et al (2008).…”
Section: Selection Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The retrieval has a lower altitude limit of 6 km and an upper altitude limit of 107 km. ACE-FTS v2.2 NO was validated by Kerzenmacher et al (2008), and there were two known issues with the v2.2 results (still present in the v3.5 NO results). At altitudes below ∼ 20 km, NO VMRs suffer from a significant negative bias that causes many unphysical negative results.…”
Section: Ace-ftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for diurnal variations, calculations made using the "Pratmo" photochemical box model (McLinden et al, 2002) are used to scale local times between the two instruments. This model was used by Kerzenmacher et al (2008) in the validation of version 2.2 of the ACE-FTS (Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment -Fourier Transform Spectrometer) NO and NO 2 data. ACE-FTS level 2 version 3.5 data are used in comparison to coincident level 2 data from the satellite instruments Global Ozone Monitoring by Occultation of Stars (GO-MOS), Halogen Occultation Experiment (HALOE), Measurements of Aerosol Extinction in the Stratosphere and Troposphere Retrieved by Occultation (MAESTRO), Michelson Table 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%