2012
DOI: 10.3390/rs4051134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of NOAA-Interactive Multisensor Snow and Ice Mapping System (IMS) by Comparison with Ground-Based Measurements over Continental United States

Abstract: Abstract:In this study, daily maps of snow cover distribution and sea ice extent produced by NOAA's interactive multisensor snow and ice mapping system (IMS) were validated using in situ snow depth data from observing stations obtained from NOAA's National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) for calendar years 2006 to 2010. IMS provides daily maps of snow and sea ice extent within the Northern Hemisphere using data from combination of geostationary and polar orbiting satellites in visible, infrared and microwave spect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the combination of MODIS and AMSR-E/IMS can take advantage of both high spatial resolution of optical data and cloud transparency of passive microwave data, the combination might reduce the spatial resolution of MODIS products because cloud pixels in MODIS are replaced by AMSR-E/IMS images, which have coarse spatial resolution; therefore, the accuracy of the cloud pixel reclassification fully depends on the accuracy of AMSR-E and IMS. In previous studies, AMSR-E and IMS data were widely used for monitoring snow, and both of them have relatively high accuracy [28][29][30][31]. On the other hand, because of the poor performance in the forest area, the Kappa test of integrated snow products shows moderate consistency with Landsat, and snow monitoring in this regions also remains a major problem for virtually all types of global remote sensing snow products, for which overall accuracy were seriously affected due to the forest canopy [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the combination of MODIS and AMSR-E/IMS can take advantage of both high spatial resolution of optical data and cloud transparency of passive microwave data, the combination might reduce the spatial resolution of MODIS products because cloud pixels in MODIS are replaced by AMSR-E/IMS images, which have coarse spatial resolution; therefore, the accuracy of the cloud pixel reclassification fully depends on the accuracy of AMSR-E and IMS. In previous studies, AMSR-E and IMS data were widely used for monitoring snow, and both of them have relatively high accuracy [28][29][30][31]. On the other hand, because of the poor performance in the forest area, the Kappa test of integrated snow products shows moderate consistency with Landsat, and snow monitoring in this regions also remains a major problem for virtually all types of global remote sensing snow products, for which overall accuracy were seriously affected due to the forest canopy [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this relevance, and the generally impractical nature of in situ monitoring, considerable research in satellite-based methods for sea ice mapping has been developed (e.g., [26,27]). These efforts are led by the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), which provides an array of data sets derived from passive microwave, visible and thermal infrared sensors, and field observations (http://nsidc.org/data/seaice/).…”
Section: Sea Ice Edge and Extentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the result was scanned with a nominal resolution of 190 km. This system has been enhanced to produce daily coverage with a resolution of 23 km [3,4]. In 1999, the spatial resolution of the NESDIS product increased to 5 km, with a further improvement of the IMS system that takes into account the data from the passive microwave sensor, SSM/I [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their quality varies according to the sensor and platform characteristics, image processing procedures and snow classification techniques [1][2][3]. Until 1997, the only available operational products were the weekly charts from the interactive multisensor snow and ice mapping system (IMS) covering the Northern Hemisphere and produced by the National Environmental Satellite Data and Information Service (NESDIS) [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%