2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of publicly-available software used in analyzing NGS data for HIV-1 drug resistance mutations and transmission networks in a Washington, DC, Cohort

Abstract: The DC Cohort is an ongoing longitudinal observational study of persons living with HIV. To better understand HIV-1 drug resistance and potential transmission clusters among these participants, we performed targeted, paired-end next-generation sequencing (NGS) of protease , reverse transcriptase and integrase amplicons. We elected to use free, publicly-available software (HyDRA Web, Stanford HIVdb and HIV-TRACE) for data analyses so that labo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We detected high levels of clustering using haplotypes (32.8-64.2%, not including the V1V2 region), as also seen in other HIV-1 cohorts (24-65%) 29,35,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] . Other studies, including one completed with Sanger sequencing in DC 28,31,36,52,62 , however, have found lower levels of clustering (7-17%), in agreement with those reported here for the consensus sequence phylogenetic clusters (pol(c) and env(c)) and the V1V2 region for haplotypes (9.0%). Therefore, a more comprehensive understanding of HIV-1 transmission events in DC has been achieved when evaluating multiple genes together, rather than primarily focusing on polymerase genes that are typically screened for DRMs in clinical settings or used in investigations at the local health department level.…”
Section: Pr/rt Int Envsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We detected high levels of clustering using haplotypes (32.8-64.2%, not including the V1V2 region), as also seen in other HIV-1 cohorts (24-65%) 29,35,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] . Other studies, including one completed with Sanger sequencing in DC 28,31,36,52,62 , however, have found lower levels of clustering (7-17%), in agreement with those reported here for the consensus sequence phylogenetic clusters (pol(c) and env(c)) and the V1V2 region for haplotypes (9.0%). Therefore, a more comprehensive understanding of HIV-1 transmission events in DC has been achieved when evaluating multiple genes together, rather than primarily focusing on polymerase genes that are typically screened for DRMs in clinical settings or used in investigations at the local health department level.…”
Section: Pr/rt Int Envsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A Drug Resistant Mutation (DRM) prevalence of 48.6-54.0% was detected in this subset of the DC Cohort, depending on use of consensus sequence or haplotypes. Lower DRM prevalence rates were previously reported for the DC area 28,29,34,36 (17.3-37.9% between 1994 and 2016). A much higher rate (66%) was reported in a smaller study of ART treatment-naïve and experienced pediatric patients in Rhode Island 37 .…”
Section: Pr/rt Int Envmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eight studies containing 855 samples from 821 persons met the inclusion criteria [1825] (Figure 1; Table 1). These samples included 693 PR, 700 RT, and 449 IN NGS sequence sets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies had the lowest numbers of both usual and unusual mutations, and of the proportions of unusual mutations [21, 22]. Four studies had intermediate values for these three metrics [18, 20, 24, 25], and two had higher values [19, 23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%