2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05032-4_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Railway Interlocking Systems by Formal Verification, A Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the presence of the relay on the measuring set-up, some points could not be directly measured by the sensor (e.g., points 13,18,23,28). For these positions, the corresponding values were calculated as averages of the neighboring points, which could be directly measured.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the presence of the relay on the measuring set-up, some points could not be directly measured by the sensor (e.g., points 13,18,23,28). For these positions, the corresponding values were calculated as averages of the neighboring points, which could be directly measured.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generation of these models usually involves the digitalization of existing relay schematics either in a specially designed schematics software [10] or by recoding them as an XML file [11]. The language used to describe the behavior of relay interlockings is usually Boolean [12] or LLD [13]. Regardless of the generation method, all models are checked using formal methods [4,14,15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%