2020
DOI: 10.2172/1599576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of RU-WRF, the Custom Atmospheric Mesoscale Model of the Rutgers Center for Ocean Observing Leadership

Abstract: Department of Energy (DOE) reports produced after 1991 and a growing number of pre-1991 documents are available free via www.OSTI.gov.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar in scope to the WIND Toolkit, the NEWA is a 30-year WRF-based data set covering all of Europe. NREL recently completed an offshore study of WRF model sensitivity in partnership with Rutgers Center for Ocean Observing Leadership(Optis et al 2020). Results from this study support previous research findings and found that the PBL scheme, reanalysis forcing, and SST forcings were all key drivers of model sensitivity, especially on short timescales.Based on this literature review and NREL's previous experience on WRF sensitivity in offshore wind resource modeling, a total of 16 model setups are constructed based on variations in four key model components.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…Similar in scope to the WIND Toolkit, the NEWA is a 30-year WRF-based data set covering all of Europe. NREL recently completed an offshore study of WRF model sensitivity in partnership with Rutgers Center for Ocean Observing Leadership(Optis et al 2020). Results from this study support previous research findings and found that the PBL scheme, reanalysis forcing, and SST forcings were all key drivers of model sensitivity, especially on short timescales.Based on this literature review and NREL's previous experience on WRF sensitivity in offshore wind resource modeling, a total of 16 model setups are constructed based on variations in four key model components.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…The main data source is the network of buoy-based wind speed measurements from the National Data Buoy Center, maintained by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (National Data Buoy Center, 1971). These data have been used to characterize the wind resource in offshore California (Wang et al, 2019;Optis et al, 2020c), the US offshore Atlantic (Optis et al, 2020b), and the Great Lakes (Doubrawa et al, 2015). These buoys generally provide years worth of wind speed measurements at heights of less than 5 m and are of high quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Rutgers University Center for Ocean Observing Leadership (RU-COOL) at Rutgers University runs a daily real-time version of WRF, called RU-WRF, which is tailored to the U.S. Mid and North Atlantic OSW energy [10], and has been continously evaluated and updated since then [16]. RU-WRF runs a parent nest at 9 km resolution out to 120 hours and a child nest at 3 km resolution out to 48 hours, generating hourly forecasts of multiple meteorological variables, which are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Numerical Weather Predictions From Ru-wrfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One criticism often pointed at statistical and ML methods, however, is that they are, by and large, physics-agnostic, i.e., they are formulated with little consideration of the physics of wind field formation and propagation, and hence, may be susceptible to model specifications that violate those first principles. This has driven an active area of research in ML Figure 1: Two days of meso-scale NWPs from the RU-WRF meso-scale model [10], along with co-located wind speed observations. Both data and forecasts are obtained in proximity to the planned OSW energy areas in the NY/NJ Bight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%