2013
DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2013.799278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Simulated Chestband Data in Frontal and Lateral Loading Using a Human Body Finite Element Model

Abstract: Though this work was focused on techniques to extract and analyze chestband data from FE models, the comparative results provide further validation of the model used in this study. The results suggest the importance of evaluating comparisons between virtual and experimental chestband data on a regional basis. These data also provide the potential to correlate chestband deformations to the loading of underlying thoraco-abdominal structures. Supplemental materials are available for this article. Go to the publis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GHBMC M50 v4.2 is preprogrammed with upper, middle, and lower chestbands that are each composed of 32 nodes (Hayes et al 2014). Chestbands were placed around the circumference of the chest approximately at the level of the fourth, sixth, and eight ribs.…”
Section: Simulation Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GHBMC M50 v4.2 is preprogrammed with upper, middle, and lower chestbands that are each composed of 32 nodes (Hayes et al 2014). Chestbands were placed around the circumference of the chest approximately at the level of the fourth, sixth, and eight ribs.…”
Section: Simulation Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whole body simulation configuration and occupant position are shown for the M50-O ( Figures 2B-G) with rigid impactors shown in gray. These simulations mimicked the experimental testing configurations of previously validated (Vavalle et al, 2013;Hayes et al, 2014) and published rigid hub (n = 8) ( Figures 2B-E) (Kroell et al, 1971;Viano, 1989;Hardy et al, 2001;Koh et al, 2005) and full body sled pulses (n = 6) ( Figures 2F,G) (Wismans et al, 1986;Forman et al, 2006). Due to the complexity of two full body testing configurations (Figure 2G), the model versions used for the original simulation development were used in this study (versions 4.5 and 1.8.4 of the M50-O and M50-OS, respectively), although no changes in the neck models were made for these later versions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Chest bands were modeled by tracking skin nodes on the THUMS thorax in locations comparable to experimental chest band location ( Fig. 2C) (Kuppa and Eppinger, 1998;Pintar et al, 1997;Haynes et al, 2014). The chest bands were analyzed by calculating the distance from a node on the front to a corresponding node on the back throughout the course of the simulations.…”
Section: Injury Metric Assessment In Thumsmentioning
confidence: 99%