2018
DOI: 10.3390/ijms19102930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Suitable Housekeeping Genes for the Normalization of mRNA Expression for Studying Tumor Acidosis

Abstract: Similar to other types of cancer, acidification of tumor microenvironment is an important feature of osteosarcoma, and a major source of cellular stress that triggers cancer aggressiveness, drug resistance, and progression. Among the different effects of low extracellular pH on tumor cells, we have recently found that short-term exposure to acidosis strongly affects gene expression. This alteration might also occur for the most commonly used housekeeping genes (HKG), thereby causing erroneous interpretation of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We quantitatively checked the presence of several genes, in terms of average expression across the entire cell population (expressed as Log10 average TPM) and in terms of number of cells with at least one read mapped on the gene ( Figure 1 C for BE2C, Figure 1 D for Kelly). We checked the expression of four commonly used housekeeping genes: ACTB, GAPDH, B2M and GUSB [ 44 ]. All these genes are highly expressed and could be detected in almost all cells, with the exception of GUSB, detected in only ~50% of both Kelly and BE2C cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We quantitatively checked the presence of several genes, in terms of average expression across the entire cell population (expressed as Log10 average TPM) and in terms of number of cells with at least one read mapped on the gene ( Figure 1 C for BE2C, Figure 1 D for Kelly). We checked the expression of four commonly used housekeeping genes: ACTB, GAPDH, B2M and GUSB [ 44 ]. All these genes are highly expressed and could be detected in almost all cells, with the exception of GUSB, detected in only ~50% of both Kelly and BE2C cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that once selected, a reference for a given model will not necessarily be selected once again in an experiment repeated for this model after some time, even if the pool of candidate reference genes used is exactly the same. This is because the gene expression pattern at the time point of sample collection depends on the current rate of cell mass growth and on microenvironmental conditions [20, 21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many studies have provided convincing evidence that the level of transcription of housekeeping genes differs according to the developmental stage and other experimental conditions [27, 28]. For determination of the best candidate reference gene, the following statistical five algorithms were used: NormFinder, geNorm, BestKeeper, ΔCT, and coefficient of variation [29]. However, normalization results, which cannot be solved by the aforementioned algorithms, vary depending on the housekeeping gene used (e.g., GAPDH, HPRT), the expression of which varies during embryonic stem cell differentiation and according to the stage of embryogenesis in specific tissues [14, 16, 30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%