2016
DOI: 10.32890/mjli2016.13.2.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Teaching and Learning Guiding Principles Instrument for Malaysian Higher Learning Institutions

Abstract: Purpose-This study was aimed at establishing, through the validation of the Teaching and Learning Guiding Principles Instrument (TLGPI), the validity and reliability of the underlying factor structure of the Teaching and Learning Guiding Principles (TLGP) generated by a previous study. Method-A survey method was used to collect data through the 67-item TLGPI. The TLGPI was hypothesised to measure the six constructs of the TLGP. The TLGPI was administered online to all academicians from 20 public universities i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it was agreed that by incorporating a collaborative learning environment, the lecturers could encourage learners to interact in multiple and meaningful ways, develop critical, communication and social skills (Rahman et. al., 2016).…”
Section: Inclusive Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it was agreed that by incorporating a collaborative learning environment, the lecturers could encourage learners to interact in multiple and meaningful ways, develop critical, communication and social skills (Rahman et. al., 2016).…”
Section: Inclusive Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many studies that examine the validity and reliability of instruments in various fields of study (Rahman et al, 2016;Sajari et al, 2023;Hashim et al, 2023;Matore 2017). Nevertheless, most teaching evaluation questionnaires have not presented sufficient evidence of validity Masuwai et al (2016), and the field of teacher education has been criticized for its lack of attention to validity and reliability issues in evaluation research (Grossman et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%