2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2014.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the 13C-bicarbonate tracer technique for determination of CO2 production and energy expenditure in ponies by indirect calorimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
13
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, RQ values were found to be 0.85 in fasted humans (Junghans et al, 2008) and in fasted bulls (Junghans et al, 2007). For ponies fed simultaneously with administration of 13 C-bicarbonate (similar to T 0 in this study) RQ values of 0.79 were found, independent of administration route (IV or oral; Jensen et al, 2015). This is in agreement with the present results, where an average RQ of 0.81 was found regardless of administration route.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In previous studies, RQ values were found to be 0.85 in fasted humans (Junghans et al, 2008) and in fasted bulls (Junghans et al, 2007). For ponies fed simultaneously with administration of 13 C-bicarbonate (similar to T 0 in this study) RQ values of 0.79 were found, independent of administration route (IV or oral; Jensen et al, 2015). This is in agreement with the present results, where an average RQ of 0.81 was found regardless of administration route.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The average RQ Figure 3 Effect of feeding 3 h before (T − 3 ), at the same time (T 0 ) or 3 h after (T + 3 ) a dose of 13 C-bicarbonate on O 2 consumption (l/kg BW per day), CO 2 production (l/kg BW per day) and respiratory quotient (RQ) measured hourly by indirect calorimetry for 6 h. must be estimated better than with 10% error to avoid erroneous estimation of EE (Junghans et al, 2008). An error of +0.1 in absolute RQ units (if the 'true' RQ is assumed to be 0.81) would underestimate EE with 8.5% in the present experiment, which is in accordance with Junghans et al (2007) and Jensen et al (2015), who, with a similar error in RQ, estimated the error in EE to be 8% to 9% in bulls and ponies, respectively. To reduce factors influencing RQ, Jensen et al (2015) suggested that feeding the animals immediately before and during measurements ought to be avoided in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations