1980
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(198010)36:4<927::aid-jclp2270360416>3.0.co;2-#
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the 16 PF in a psychiatric setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few studies have been concerned with the evaluation of existing assessment procedures such as the MMPI, the 16PF, and the Minnesota Percepto-Diagnostic Test in diagnosing psychiatric populations (Helmes, Holden, & Howe, 1980; Howe & Helmes, 1980; Page, 1982), but the results have generally been disappointing. Helmes, Landmark, and Kazarian (1983) have recently compared twelve different diagnostic systems for diagnosing schizophrenia and found the systems of Langfeldt and Schneider and the DSM III to yield die highest reliabilities.…”
Section: Review Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have been concerned with the evaluation of existing assessment procedures such as the MMPI, the 16PF, and the Minnesota Percepto-Diagnostic Test in diagnosing psychiatric populations (Helmes, Holden, & Howe, 1980; Howe & Helmes, 1980; Page, 1982), but the results have generally been disappointing. Helmes, Landmark, and Kazarian (1983) have recently compared twelve different diagnostic systems for diagnosing schizophrenia and found the systems of Langfeldt and Schneider and the DSM III to yield die highest reliabilities.…”
Section: Review Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%