2008
DOI: 10.1002/gps.2079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Arabic version of the 5‐item WHO well being index in elderly population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
68
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
6
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings have been described in various studies from different populations [3,[11][12][13][14][15]21]. ROC analysis confirmed a moderate ability of the scale to discriminate depressive and non-depressive subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar findings have been described in various studies from different populations [3,[11][12][13][14][15]21]. ROC analysis confirmed a moderate ability of the scale to discriminate depressive and non-depressive subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A Cronbach's alpha value of 0.83 for both general and depressed samples means that all of the five questions are related to each other, yet they are not identical, and thus, none of them can be dismissed. Similar internal consistency, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89, was found in previous studies with different populations [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, this scale has been found as a valid scale among elderly people in previous studies (Abla Mehio et al 2009;Awata et al 2006;Bonsignore et al 2001;Lowe et al 2004;Ratana et al 2009;Saipanish et al 2009;Shuichi et al 2007).…”
Section: Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The Well-being scale is composed of five questions (Appendix) contained in the World Health Organization’s Well-Being index [15]. This scale has been validated, translated to many languages, and used in studies in different countries [16].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%