2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3956(01)00052-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the behavioural activity rating scale (BARS)™: a novel measure of activity in agitated patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in a recent naturalistic study in acutely agitated patients, the baseline mean PANSS-EC score was 26.5 (San et al, 2006), and in the present study it was 29, representing much greater agitation. Another recent naturalistic study (Preval et al, 2005) conducted in a psychiatric emergency service reported a mean agitation score of 6.6 on the Behavioral Activity Rating Scale (Swift et al, 2002), which corresponded to 'extremely active, not requiring restraint'. Illness severity was moderate (CGI mean baseline score ¼ 4.6) in a randomized clinical trial in acutely agitated patients with bipolar mania (Meehan et al, 2001), but agitated psychotic patients with bipolar mania or schizophrenia in a naturalistic trial were markedly ill (CGI mean baseline score ¼ 5.5) (San et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a recent naturalistic study in acutely agitated patients, the baseline mean PANSS-EC score was 26.5 (San et al, 2006), and in the present study it was 29, representing much greater agitation. Another recent naturalistic study (Preval et al, 2005) conducted in a psychiatric emergency service reported a mean agitation score of 6.6 on the Behavioral Activity Rating Scale (Swift et al, 2002), which corresponded to 'extremely active, not requiring restraint'. Illness severity was moderate (CGI mean baseline score ¼ 4.6) in a randomized clinical trial in acutely agitated patients with bipolar mania (Meehan et al, 2001), but agitated psychotic patients with bipolar mania or schizophrenia in a naturalistic trial were markedly ill (CGI mean baseline score ¼ 5.5) (San et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Another scale is the Behavioural Activity Rating Scale or BARS (Table 1). 4 The American Association for Emergency Psychiatry does not consider one agitation rating scale to be better than another, although we find the BARS is easy to use reliably, even for one not trained in psychiatry or emergency medicine. The BARS was created to help assess agitation in pharmaceutical study trials.…”
Section: Level Of Agitationmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The Behavioural Activity Rating Scale (BARS)24 and CGI-Severity22 were used retrospectively to measure behaviour just prior to the injections, and BARS and CGI-Improvement were used at 20–30 min following the injection. Mean BARS score decreased from 6.5±0.7 (violent/continuously active) to 3.1±1.3 (quiet/drowsy) and in 81% of cases, CGI-Improvement was ≤2 (much or very much improved).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prospective studies used inconsistent outcome measures which included the BARS,24 Children’s Agitation Scale,15 CGI Scale,22 Connor’s teacher scale21 and youth’s report of whether the medication ‘worked’ 28. Retrospective studies made some attempt to measure episode duration, typically interpreting existing nursing notes about activity and agitation level, or reporting commonly recorded metrics such as restraint duration or need for another dose of a PRN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%