2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2003.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the brief pain inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
927
3
10

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,187 publications
(955 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
15
927
3
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical shoulder pain ratings were assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), which includes a numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain intensity (Cleeland and Ryan, 1994;Cleeland et al, 1996;Tan et al, 2004). Subjects used the BPI to rate their shoulder pain intensity over three conditions, the present pain intensity, the worst pain intensity over the past 24 h, and the best pain intensity over the past 24 h. These three ratings were summed and divided by three (arithmetic mean) because that methodology was most consistent with the purposes of this study (Jensen et al, 1996(Jensen et al, , 1999.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical shoulder pain ratings were assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), which includes a numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain intensity (Cleeland and Ryan, 1994;Cleeland et al, 1996;Tan et al, 2004). Subjects used the BPI to rate their shoulder pain intensity over three conditions, the present pain intensity, the worst pain intensity over the past 24 h, and the best pain intensity over the past 24 h. These three ratings were summed and divided by three (arithmetic mean) because that methodology was most consistent with the purposes of this study (Jensen et al, 1996(Jensen et al, , 1999.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interference scores range from 0 to 10, with 10 indicating the most pain-related interference. The BPI has demonstrated strong psychometric properties and appears to be sensitive to changes in pain over time [32].…”
Section: Pain Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measures of efficacy, safety and harm are subjective impressions of the patient and the provider, even when assessed using validated "objective" multidimensional scales such as the Brief Pain Inventory. 4 How much improvement in pain, function and quality of life is enough to say the opioid treatment is efficacious for any given patient? Does a pain score that improves from 9 to 7 on a 10-point scale warrant continued opioid therapy?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%