2022
DOI: 10.3390/nu14224782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Children’s Eating Behaviour Questionnaire in Poland

Abstract: Introduction: Obesity is increasingly diagnosed in pre-school and early primary school children. Eating styles displayed by the youngest children may contribute to the development of overweight and obesity. Their assessment may be extremely important in diagnosing the causes of obesity, but also in planning treatment. Aim of the study: In view of the need to introduce a tool for assessing eating behaviours in children in Poland, the aim of the study was to develop the Polish adaptation of the Children’s Eating… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it is worth emphasizing that these studies had several limitations that should be eliminated by conducting further analyses in this area: (a) this was a cross-sectional study in which a relatively small sample took part (especially when referring to its size for regression analysis), recruited using voluntary sampling design, (b) the study was conducted in paper form for the clinical sample and in online form (online survey) for the non-clinical sample (which was caused by restrictions related to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic), (c) the measurement was based only on subjective reports from caregivers from a small sample size, (d) not all measures were validated in the Polish sample (publications on the validation of some measures appeared only after the beginning of our study, e.g., [58,59]), (e) the original version of the EDY-Q is a self-report measure (in this study, it was used in the version in which parents assessed the functioning of their children), (f) the reliability of some CEBQ and CFQ subscales could be improved, (g) sensory sensitivity was assessed using ASD diagnosis measure (ASRS); therefore, it was not a tool dedicated to an in-depth diagnosis of sensory sensitivity in the clinical and non-clinical sample. Finally, it should be emphasized that since there could be masked elements contributing to the feeding challenges among these children (e.g., resistance to change, hypo-or hyper sensitivities, oral-motor skill deficits, medical complexity, cognitive and adaptive functioning abilities, genetic disorders), further research needs to analyse the background of these difficulties and challenges much more carefully.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is worth emphasizing that these studies had several limitations that should be eliminated by conducting further analyses in this area: (a) this was a cross-sectional study in which a relatively small sample took part (especially when referring to its size for regression analysis), recruited using voluntary sampling design, (b) the study was conducted in paper form for the clinical sample and in online form (online survey) for the non-clinical sample (which was caused by restrictions related to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic), (c) the measurement was based only on subjective reports from caregivers from a small sample size, (d) not all measures were validated in the Polish sample (publications on the validation of some measures appeared only after the beginning of our study, e.g., [58,59]), (e) the original version of the EDY-Q is a self-report measure (in this study, it was used in the version in which parents assessed the functioning of their children), (f) the reliability of some CEBQ and CFQ subscales could be improved, (g) sensory sensitivity was assessed using ASD diagnosis measure (ASRS); therefore, it was not a tool dedicated to an in-depth diagnosis of sensory sensitivity in the clinical and non-clinical sample. Finally, it should be emphasized that since there could be masked elements contributing to the feeding challenges among these children (e.g., resistance to change, hypo-or hyper sensitivities, oral-motor skill deficits, medical complexity, cognitive and adaptive functioning abilities, genetic disorders), further research needs to analyse the background of these difficulties and challenges much more carefully.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%