2018
DOI: 10.1590/s1982-21702018000300026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Digital Elevation Model (Srtm) With GNSS Surveying Applied to the Mirim Lagoon Hydrographic Basin

Abstract: Between 2013 and 2014, a kinematic positioning based on the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) was carried out for this research work. This GNSS survey resulted in 275916 points with tridimensional coordinates in the cross-border basin area of 58205 km2 called Mirim Lagoon Hydrographic Basin, located in south of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) and west of Uruguay. This study aims at showing the methodology firstly and, furthermore, results regarding the validation of the vertical accuracy of the DEM SRTM thr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Global models usually present lower heights and the differences amount to several dozen metres. A known fact from the literature is that the absolute vertical accuracy of the SRTM model varies from a few to several metres, depending on the terrain cover [91]. This was also confirmed by this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Global models usually present lower heights and the differences amount to several dozen metres. A known fact from the literature is that the absolute vertical accuracy of the SRTM model varies from a few to several metres, depending on the terrain cover [91]. This was also confirmed by this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Table 3, presented in Results Section, briefly confirms the altimetry models conformity to literature studies and the technical descriptions published by models producers (Morais, 2017;Morais et al 2017;Scalco et al 2018;França et al 2019 andOrlandi et al 2019). The free cost low quality models presented an overall similar quality with a slight advantage for the ALOS_ASF over SRTM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…A previous step of adherence assessment is an evaluation of the models ALS, ALOS_ASF and SRTM based in a relative comparison to increase the consistency of the study. It is well known, either by technical descriptions or by literature studies (Morais, 2017;Morais et al 2017;Scalco et al 2018;França et al 2019 andOrlandi et al 2019) that ALS has the best accuracy among the three models, thus an internal evaluation was performed by extracting the basic statistics (minimum, maximum, mean, standard deviation and RMSE) from the models ALS, ALOS_ASF and SRTM, and also from the subtraction models (ALS-ALOS_ASF) and (ALS-SRTM). These statistics values provide a general view of ALOS_ASF and SRTM accuracy compared to ALS for checking if they corroborate literature studies.…”
Section: Assessment Of Results Adherencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the advancement of technology, the use of digital elevation models elaborated from SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) data has become widespread and used in various fields of science and many of them are freely available. Good examples of quality control tests involving these products are reported in Callahanand Berber (2022), Alba-Fernández (2021), Ariza-López and Reinoso-Gordo (2021), Rodríguez-Avi (2021), Ariza-López et al (2017), Ariza-López and Chicaiza Mora (2018), Boulomytis et al (2017), Egg et al (2013), Ferreira (2014), França et al (2019), Mesa-Mingorance et al (2017), Mesa-Mingorance; Ariza-López (2020), , , Mozas-Calvache et al (2017), Orlandi et al (2019), Polidori et al (2014), Santos et al (2016), Scalco et al (2018), among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%