2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in grades 7 through 12

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

12
125
2
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
12
125
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the measures of intelligence and reading comprehension were significantly related to most of the reasoning conditions, without showing differential association with the imaginable and neutral conditions, which were used to compute the visual impedance effect. A relation between reasoning and reading (accuracy, time, and, especially, comprehension) has been validated through this study's findings, in agreement with previous studies (Ahmed et al, 2016;Cromley & Azevedo, 2007;Graesser, Singer, & Trabasso, 1994;Kendeou et al, 2014;Segers & Verhoeven, 2016;Tzeng, 2010). Inference making, which is a basic process in reasoning, is also a significant element of reading comprehension (Daugaard et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the measures of intelligence and reading comprehension were significantly related to most of the reasoning conditions, without showing differential association with the imaginable and neutral conditions, which were used to compute the visual impedance effect. A relation between reasoning and reading (accuracy, time, and, especially, comprehension) has been validated through this study's findings, in agreement with previous studies (Ahmed et al, 2016;Cromley & Azevedo, 2007;Graesser, Singer, & Trabasso, 1994;Kendeou et al, 2014;Segers & Verhoeven, 2016;Tzeng, 2010). Inference making, which is a basic process in reasoning, is also a significant element of reading comprehension (Daugaard et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A relation between reasoning and reading (accuracy, time, and, especially, comprehension) has been validated through this study's findings, in agreement with previous studies (Ahmed et al, 2016;Cromley & Azevedo, 2007;Graesser, Singer, & Trabasso, 1994;Kendeou et al, 2014;Segers & Verhoeven, 2016;Tzeng, 2010). In general, the measures of intelligence and reading comprehension were significantly related to most of the reasoning conditions, without showing differential association with the imaginable and neutral conditions, which were used to compute the visual impedance effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The results of Cromley and Azevedo (2007), Ahmed et al (2016), and Segers and Verhoeven (2016) lend support to the proposal that inference making is supported by word knowledge (see also, Cain & Oakhill, 2014;Perfetti, Yang, & Schmalhofer, 2008). Importantly though, neither of the studies assessed whether the data supported an alternative hypothesis: that vocabulary mediates the effect of inference making on reading comprehension.…”
Section: [Figure 1]mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In the study by Segers and Verhoeven (2016), vocabulary was also assessed with a pen and pencil test, in which children were asked to choose a synonym (from four alternatives) of an underlined word in a sentence. Interestingly, an important finding by Ahmed et al (2016) was that when method bias (arising from the reading requirements of component skill test formats) was controlled statistically, this reduced the importance of vocabulary and increased the importance of inference making. The vocabulary variable by Ahmed et al (2016) included a reading vocabulary test (the same test as Cromley and Azevedo), a word-learning test and an oral vocabulary test (administered with half of the participants).…”
Section: [Figure 1]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation