2011
DOI: 10.1002/lt.22447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the donor risk index in orthotopic liver transplantation within the Eurotransplant region

Abstract: In Eurotransplant, more than 50% of liver allografts come from extended criteria donors (ECDs). However, not every ECD is the same. The limits of their use are being explored. A continuous scoring system for analyzing donor risk has been developed within the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN), the Donor Risk Index (DRI). The objective of this study was the validation of this donor risk index (DRI) in Eurotransplant. The study was a database analysis of all 5939 liver transplants involving dec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
86
1
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
86
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Several donor parameters have been identified as relative risk factors for poor outcome, including age; steatosis; DCD donation; split livers; prolonged cold ischaemia time (>12 hours). These were all developed using North American data and formulated into an algorithm known as the 'Donor Risk Index' (DRI) [3], and later validated using European data [4].…”
Section: Higher Risk Donor Organsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several donor parameters have been identified as relative risk factors for poor outcome, including age; steatosis; DCD donation; split livers; prolonged cold ischaemia time (>12 hours). These were all developed using North American data and formulated into an algorithm known as the 'Donor Risk Index' (DRI) [3], and later validated using European data [4].…”
Section: Higher Risk Donor Organsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess donor quality we used the donor risk index modified to the Eurotransplant region for which high scores are associated with inferior outcome for the recipient, but with a low predictive ability (20,22,29,30). Data were retrospectively collected, but with a low frequency of missing data, for example biochemistry data were only missing for 10 patients (3%) at day 10 after transplantation.…”
Section: /24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 For example, as the age of the donor and the risk index increase, there is a stepwise decrease in liver survival. 5,6 The key question is to understand the basis of this association and the phenotype and mechanism of the failures. Associations with donor age are complicated by the inherent bias in organ allocation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%