2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the extended Influence Behavior Questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
229
2
14

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
229
2
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 shows the influence tactics in order, according to their frequency for USA and Spanish populations. These results suggest that the most frequent tactic is "Rational persuasion for USA population"; while, the least common is "Exchange tactics" (Yukl et al 2008). These results are very similar to those obtained for the Spanish population.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 4 shows the influence tactics in order, according to their frequency for USA and Spanish populations. These results suggest that the most frequent tactic is "Rational persuasion for USA population"; while, the least common is "Exchange tactics" (Yukl et al 2008). These results are very similar to those obtained for the Spanish population.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…On the other hand, only some of them had managerial responsibilities. Although the authors have followed the suggestions of Yukl et al (2008) on this issue, it would be interesting to check the differences between the supervisors and subordinates' perspectives about the use of dyadic influence tactics. To achieve this goal, an agent-directed questionnaire, equivalent to the used one in this research, could be developed and distributed among supervisors.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample items include "Acted in a friendly manner prior to asking for what I wanted" and "explained the reason of my request". Although the influence tactics taxonomy comprises of more categories, we only selected four (i.e., two for hard and two for soft), as they are considered antipodal behaviors that fall into the opposite polars of the strength dimension (Tepper et al, 18 1993;Yukl, Seifert, & Chavez, 2008). Managers answered each question using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (I can't remember me ever using this tactic) to 7 (I use this tactic very often), depending on the frequency with which they use these tactics to influence others to carry out requests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many sources of social power in an organization, for instance referent power (French and Raven 1959). Yukl et al (2008) developed a taxonomy of eleven tactics used to proactively influence others and to gain power: e.g., rational persuasion, exchange, and inspirational appeal. Uhl-Bien and Carsten (2007) are one of the few who touched upon the necessity for ethical leaders to gain power.…”
Section: Capability For Moral Entrepreneurship: Drive Toward Transitimentioning
confidence: 99%