2016
DOI: 10.1080/03091902.2016.1253795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Fitbit One, Garmin Vivofit and Jawbone UP activity tracker in estimation of energy expenditure during treadmill walking and running

Abstract: Energy expenditure reported by the devices distinguished between walking and running, with a general increase as exercise intensity increased. However, the reported energy expenditure from these devices should be interpreted with caution, given their potential bias and error. Practical implications Although devices report the same outcome of EE estimation, they are not equivalent to each other and differ from criterion measurements during walking and running. These devices are not suitable as research measurem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
63
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[17][18][19]20,21 Although an overall clear picture of physical activity in children with CHD is lacking, the reliability, validity and objectivity of such wearables has been validated. [22][23][24] Therefore, the aim of this study was to find out how active children with various CHD are compared with healthy peers as measured in daily steps and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), which refers to an energy cost of ³3 metabolic equivalents, using wearables. Furthermore, subjectively estimated and objectively measured physical activity in children with CHD was compared.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19]20,21 Although an overall clear picture of physical activity in children with CHD is lacking, the reliability, validity and objectivity of such wearables has been validated. [22][23][24] Therefore, the aim of this study was to find out how active children with various CHD are compared with healthy peers as measured in daily steps and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), which refers to an energy cost of ³3 metabolic equivalents, using wearables. Furthermore, subjectively estimated and objectively measured physical activity in children with CHD was compared.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known from laboratory studies with triathletes that heart rate and energy expenditure is higher in running compared to cycling [43]. While the measurement of heart rate with a wrist-worn device might be reliable [44], the reported energy expenditure from these devices should be interpreted with caution [45], given their potential bias and error [46], the current wrist-worn activity trackers are most likely not accurate enough [26]. However, these devices might be suitable for the use in interventions of behavior change as they provide feedback to user on trends in energy expenditure [46].…”
Section: The Aspect Of Heart Rate and Energy Expenditurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the measurement of heart rate with a wrist-worn device might be reliable [44], the reported energy expenditure from these devices should be interpreted with caution [45], given their potential bias and error [46], the current wrist-worn activity trackers are most likely not accurate enough [26]. However, these devices might be suitable for the use in interventions of behavior change as they provide feedback to user on trends in energy expenditure [46]. Energy expenditure reported by wrist-worn devices differs between different sports disciplines (e.g., walking and running) with a general increase as exercise intensity increased [46].…”
Section: The Aspect Of Heart Rate and Energy Expenditurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the majority of mHealth systems are not medical products that are clinically evaluated. Therefore, validity and reliability of these systems cannot be assumed [17-20]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%