2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.resinv.2016.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Japanese disease severity classification and the GAP model in Japanese patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the existing IPF registries are relatively small in sample size and restricted to a single country, with only limited data from Central and Eastern Europe [12,18]. Moreover, the validation of valuable prognostic tools such as the GAP index in other populations has been constrained by the relatively small cohort sizes and short follow-up [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the existing IPF registries are relatively small in sample size and restricted to a single country, with only limited data from Central and Eastern Europe [12,18]. Moreover, the validation of valuable prognostic tools such as the GAP index in other populations has been constrained by the relatively small cohort sizes and short follow-up [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among a number of different methods, the gender, age, physiology (GAP) index and the GAP calculator for the GAP Risk Assessment System (GAP system) have proven to be the most easy and applicable tool in the current clinical practice; however, there are still only few studies that have assessed their applicability and usefulness in daily practice. Furthermore, ethnicity has been reported as a factor that can influence the reliability of these two scoring systems, as demonstrated by the Korean and Japanese experiences . Indeed, up until now most of the data have been derived from American studies .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, ethnicity has been reported as a factor that can influence the reliability of these two scoring systems, as demonstrated by the Korean and Japanese experiences. 7,8 Indeed, up until now most of the data have been derived from American studies. 1 Finally, to our knowledge, there are still very few clinical trials that have evaluated the applicability of the GAP system in the era of antifibrotic therapies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no universal consensus on how to define disease severity of IPF patients, with several different methods including baseline FVC, diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DL CO ), GAP (gender, age and physiology) index, composite physiological index (CPI) and Japanese disease severity classification (JSC) described. Whilst there is some difficulty using a single measure of FVC to judge severity of impairment in the clinical setting where a premorbid value is often unknown, it has been widely accepted as a measure of disease progression and despite its failings, has been repeatedly used as a primary outcome measure for clinical trials …”
Section: Pharmacological Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%