2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Japanese Version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System–Revised

Abstract: The Japanese version of the ESAS-r is a reliable and valid tool for measuring symptoms in Japanese adult patients with cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
54
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in accordance with a Japanese study where ESAS-r was significantly higher in patients with an ECOG performance status of 2-4 than in those with a performance status of 0 and 1 29 . Similarly, in the study done by Shalini et al, patients with lower performance status measured by both ECOG and Karnofsky performance scales had worse QoL scores in symptomatic pancreatic pain 30 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is in accordance with a Japanese study where ESAS-r was significantly higher in patients with an ECOG performance status of 2-4 than in those with a performance status of 0 and 1 29 . Similarly, in the study done by Shalini et al, patients with lower performance status measured by both ECOG and Karnofsky performance scales had worse QoL scores in symptomatic pancreatic pain 30 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Congruent with our results, other researchers found a significant negative relationship between symptom burden and functional status of advanced cancer patients [27][28][29][30][31] . In a recent study from Egypt that included patients with metastatic cancer, the total average ESAS score differed significantly according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale from 34 in patients with an ECOG score of 1 to 70 in patients with an ECOG score…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Similarly, in a study from Japan that included 292 cancer patients, the total ESAS-r score was significantly higher among patients with an ECOG score of 2-4 than those with a score of 0-1 (p<0.0001) 28 . In another study that included pancreatic cancer patients; pain, digestive symptoms, cachexia and ascites were significantly more likely to be reported by patients with an ECOG score of ≥1 29 .…”
Section: Esas Itemmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…19, 21, 29, 30, 57 Potential reasons that the correlation was only moderate and not strong may include differences in time frames analyzed by each scale and different question phrasing and content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%