“…In one study, clinicians using an expert system (compared with conventional practice) ordered fewer laboratory tests during the diagnostic process, completed the diagnostic workup with fewer sample collections, generated lower laboratory costs, shortened the time required to reach a diagnosis, showed closer adherence to established clinical practice guidelines, and exhibited a more uniform and diagnostically successful investigation (231). Expert systems have been used to diagnose a variety of clinical conditions, including community-acquired pneumonias (9,279), septicemia (203), female genital disease and abdominal pain (263), urinary tract infection (51,281), viral (121) and infantile (90) meningitis, febrile tropical diseases (27), chronic prostatitis (31), infective endocarditis (76), and infectious diseases (266). Some systems have used fuzzy-logic methods (14); others have used the World Wide Web (76).…”