2014
DOI: 10.1002/fld.3978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the multiscale mixed finite‐element method

Abstract: SUMMARYSubsurface reservoirs generally have a complex description in terms of both geometry and geology. This poses a continuing challenge in modeling and simulation of petroleum reservoirs owing to variations of static and dynamic properties at different length scales. Multiscale methods constitute a promising approach that enables efficient simulation of geological models while retaining a level of detail in heterogeneity that would not be possible via conventional upscaling methods. Multiscale methods devel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16,42,43]. Using other types of multiscale methods for the compressible flow can be found in [31,27,5,34,37,6], but there is few evidence that these methods (most of which are the variants of MsFEM) can deal with arbitrarily complicated porous media. Therefore it is necessary to systemically study the GMsFEM for the nonlinear compressible flow in high-contrast media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16,42,43]. Using other types of multiscale methods for the compressible flow can be found in [31,27,5,34,37,6], but there is few evidence that these methods (most of which are the variants of MsFEM) can deal with arbitrarily complicated porous media. Therefore it is necessary to systemically study the GMsFEM for the nonlinear compressible flow in high-contrast media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mixed and mortar multiscale method are based on first‐order discretization for the elliptic pressure equation, a conservative velocity field can be obtained for the transport equation of the two‐phase system. It has shown a great success in simulating very practical nonlinear two phase and three phase flows (Aarnes, 2004; Pal et al., 2015; Singh et al., 2019). The multiscale finite volume method (Jenny et al., 2003) is based on the second‐order discretization of the pressure equation and is motivated by the multiscale finite element method (MsFEM), but it can also yield conservative velocity field and thus can be used for two‐phase simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mixed multiscale finite element methods (MMsFEM) (Aarnes, 2004;Aarnes & Efendiev, 2008;Chen & Hou, 2003; E. T. Chung, Efendiev, & Leung, 2015b;Pal et al, 2015;Singh et al, 2019), mortar multiscale methods (Peszyńska, 2005;Peszyńska et al, 2002;Todd et al, 2007), discontinuous Galerkin (DG) methods (Cockburn et al, 2002;Du & Chung, 2018;Kim et al, 2013), and postprocessing methods (Bush & Ginting, 2013;Odsaeter et al, 2017). Among these methods, the mixed and mortar mixed multiscale method and the multiscale finite volume method are the most popular methods for highly heterogeneous two-phase simulations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the multiscale mixed finite-element (MsMFE) method [10] is the method that has come the longest way in incorporating realistic descriptions of reservoir geology, see [1-3, 42, 46]. However, except for the somewhat idealized black-oil and compressible flow cases studied in [26,27,31,46], the MsMFE method has so far only been demonstrated to work well for incompressible flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%