2020
DOI: 10.1002/ana.25834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension Ratio with Active Standing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond the differential diagnostic implications arising from the presence of cardiovascular autonomic failure, the establishment of an appropriate therapeutic regimen is of utmost importance in order to reduce the symptomatic burden and avoid short and long-term complications of untreated BP dysregulation [93]. Screening for neurogenic OH at bedside with simple supine to standing HR and BP measurements [101,102] and confirmation of the diagnosis with CAFT should therefore always be considered if cardiovascular autonomic failure is suspected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the differential diagnostic implications arising from the presence of cardiovascular autonomic failure, the establishment of an appropriate therapeutic regimen is of utmost importance in order to reduce the symptomatic burden and avoid short and long-term complications of untreated BP dysregulation [93]. Screening for neurogenic OH at bedside with simple supine to standing HR and BP measurements [101,102] and confirmation of the diagnosis with CAFT should therefore always be considered if cardiovascular autonomic failure is suspected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orthostatic hypotension was diagnosed according to the consensus statement defining OH as a systolic blood pressure (BP) drop of at least 20 mmHg and/or a reduction in diastolic blood pressure of at least 10 mmHg at 3 min tilting or active standing [36]. Neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH) was defined by a ratio < 0.5 of the increase in heart rate divided by the decrease in systolic blood pressure during tilt-table examination [37,38]. Prior to the test, patients were asked to avoid coffee, tea or taurine-containing beverages and have their last meals 2 h before the scheduled test.…”
Section: Cardiovascular Autonomic Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An appropriate HR response is defi ned by the ratio of the change in HR to the change in systolic BP with head-up tilt or About 50% of venous pooling is in the thighs, 25% in the lower legs, and 25% in the pelvis standing. 5,6 In patients with intact autonomic responses, this ratio is greater than 0.5: for example, if the systolic BP falls by 40 mm Hg, a normal HR response should be an increase of greater than 20 beats per minute. 6 A ratio less than 0.5 identifi es a neurogenic component with good sensitivity (91%) and specifi city (88%).…”
Section: Is There An Appropriate Heart Rate Response?mentioning
confidence: 99%