2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules: Strategies for increasing specificity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Seis estudos analisaram PTA com exames de imagem; destes, três (35,37,40) utilizaram o Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR) (44) . Outros três trabalhos avaliaram mais de um PTA, e um estudo avaliou o uso de broncodilatadores na triagem (41) .…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Seis estudos analisaram PTA com exames de imagem; destes, três (35,37,40) utilizaram o Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR) (44) . Outros três trabalhos avaliaram mais de um PTA, e um estudo avaliou o uso de broncodilatadores na triagem (41) .…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…The literature suggests that the OAR exhibits high sensitivity (approximately 96.4% -99.6%) but lower specificity (26.3% -47.9%). [15][16][17][18] This indicates that while the OAR is an effective tool for identifying ankle injuries, care must be taken to mitigate the risk of false-positive results. Consistent with this literature, our study endorses the use of the OAR as an efficient diagnostic tool in the geriatric population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%