2013
DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Polish version of the EORTC QLQ-CX24 module for the assessment of health-related quality of life in women with cervical cancer

Abstract: The aim of our study was to undertake a prospective validation study of the Polish version of the EORTC cervical cancer (EORTC QLQ-CX24) module used alongside the EORTC core measure. The translated module was pilot-tested according to the established EORTC guidelines. Patients with histological confirmation of cervical cancer were eligible for the study. All patients filled out the Polish version of the EORTC QLQ-CX24 module in addition to EORTC QLQ-C30 and a demographic questionnaire. Standardised validity an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The acceptability of the questionnaires was assessed by the response rate, the percentage of missing data, and the assistance and time needed to complete the questionnaires [2729]. Statistical analysis was conducted using Statistica 10.0 PL by StatSoft Poland and Medcalc 13.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acceptability of the questionnaires was assessed by the response rate, the percentage of missing data, and the assistance and time needed to complete the questionnaires [2729]. Statistical analysis was conducted using Statistica 10.0 PL by StatSoft Poland and Medcalc 13.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To confirm the hypothesized scale structure of the P-SSSQ, convergent and discriminant validity were used. Convergent validity was assessed by correlating each item with its own scale of the P-SSSQ [18,22]. Evidence of item convergent validity was defined as a correlation of 0.40 or greater between an item and its own scale (corrected for overlap).…”
Section: Sf-36mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EORTC QLQ-C30 was included in the study. This was performed to assess to what extent clinical overlapping existed between the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EO-RTC QLQ-CX24 scales, as in previous studies (Jayasekara et al 2008;Hua et al 2013;Paradowska et al 2014).…”
Section: Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 99%