Validation of the portable Air-Smart Spirometer

Abstract

BackgroundThe Air-Smart Spirometer is the first portable device accepted by the European Community (EC) that performs spirometric measurements by a turbine mechanism and displays the results on a smartphone or a tablet.MethodsIn this multicenter, descriptive and cross-sectional prospective study carried out in 2 hospital centers, we compare FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC ratio measured with the Air Smart-Spirometer device and a conventional spirometer, and analyze the ability of this new portable device to detect obstructions. Patients were included for 2 consecutive months. We calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) and likelihood ratio (LR +, LR-) as well as the Kappa Index to evaluate the concordance between the two devices for the detection of obstruction. The agreement and relation between the values of FEV1 and FVC in absolute value and the FEV1/FVC ratio measured by both devices were analyzed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) respectively.Results200 patients (100 from each center) were included with a mean age of 57 (± 14) years, 110 were men (55%). Obstruction was detected by conventional spirometry in 73 patients (40.1%). Using a FEV1/FVC ratio smaller than 0.7 to detect obstruction with the Air Smart-Spirometer, the kappa index was 0.88, sensitivity (90.4%), specificity (97.2%), PPV (95.7%), NPV (93.7%), positive likelihood ratio (32.29), and negative likelihood ratio (0.10). The ICC and r between FEV1, FVC, and FEV1 / FVC ratio measured by the Air Smart Spirometer and the conventional spirometer were all higher than 0.94.ConclusionThe Air-Smart Spirometer is a simple and very precise instrument for detecting obstructive airway diseases. It is easy to use, which could make it especially useful non-specialized care and in other areas.

Validation of the portable Bluetooth® Air Next spirometer in patients with different respiratory diseases

“…Similar studies have been previously presented in the literature for the validation of the portable Air Smart spirometer [15,16], i.e. the predecessor of Air Next.…”

A Review of Portable Electronic Spirometers: Implications for Asthma Self-Management

“…The remaining devices had varying accuracy values (Table 1). Studies have been published that compare the accuracy of several devices (MIR Spirobank [15], MobileSpiro [16], AimSmart [17], Wing [18]) with standard spirometers.…”

“…Studies have highlighted differences in the quality and accuracy of lung function measurements collected with portable electronic spirometers, with some devices providing more reliable and accurate data than others [15][16][17][18]22]. Accuracy of lung function data is especially important given that valid spirometry testing requires substantial effort whilst exhaling to yield accurate results.…”

The utility of hand-held mobile spirometer technology in a resource-constrained setting

“…1) connected to a smartphone following onscreen prompts in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. [14] The device has a turbine mechanism to perform measurements inside the disposable singleuse nozzles. It does not require calibration, but parameters of age, sex and height are entered prior to spirometry.…”