Validation of the Positive and Negative Suicide Ideation (PANSI) Inventory in a diverse sample of young adults

Muehlenkamp, Jennifer J.; Gutierrez, Peter M.; Osman, Augustine; Barrios, Francisco X.

doi:10.1002/jclp.20051

Cited by 65 publications

(75 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As the tables show, the scores had weak to moderate associations but were not wholly redundant with one another. Mean scores from our study were comparable to scores from other college student studies using the same measures (e.g., Chang 2006;Muehlenkamp et al 2005;Norasakkunkit and Kalick 2002;Shealy et al 2007). To determine if there were any significant sex differences, a series of independent t tests was conducted on PPS, PANAS, BDI, and TSWLS scores at pretest and posttest.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 62%

“…For example, it is possible that college students tend to have easier access to positive outcome cognitions because they have all achieved success (i.e., they've all been accepted by a top-tier university) as a result of their high academic standards. We compared the mean scores of participants in our study to mean scores that other studies have reported, and even though our participants and other college participants had very similar scores, college samples in general might have higher levels of subjective wellbeing compared with community samples (Chang 2006;Molnar et al 2006;Muehlenkamp et al 2005;Norasakkunkit and Kalick 2002;Shealy et al 2007;Stewart et al 2005). Studies looking at perfectionism in community or clinical samples are necessary for better generalizability.…”

Section: Limitations Of the Present Studymentioning

confidence: 61%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effects of Socially Prescribed Expectations on Emotions and Cognitions in Asian and European Americans

Chang

2008

Cogn Ther Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examined the relation of positive and negative socially prescribed perfectionism to psychological well-being in 100 Asian American and 91 European American college students. Participants received one of four priming conditions (positive, negative, neutral expectancies and control) and completed several measures of perfectionism and psychological well-being at pretest and posttest. Findings showed that, controlling for pretest scores, priming participants with negative outcome expectancies led to higher levels of negative perfectionism and lower levels of positive perfectionism, and priming participants with positive outcome expectancies led to lower levels of negative perfectionism and higher levels of positive affect. Differences also emerged between Asian and European Americans in levels of perfectionism and the link between perfectionism and well-being. Asian Americans had lower levels of subjective well-being and higher levels of negative perfectionism than European Americans, and Asian Americans were also less susceptible to the effects of positive priming. Present findings raise the possibility that cultural differences may affect ways of thinking about the past, present and future.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 62%

Section: Limitations Of the Present Studymentioning

confidence: 61%

Effects of Socially Prescribed Expectations on Emotions and Cognitions in Asian and European Americans

Chang

2008

Cogn Ther Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The CFA further confirmed the twofactor model. Specifically, all items loading on PANSI-negative and PANSI-positive were consistent with the Osman et al, (1998) model and with results of other researchers (Osman et al, 2002;Osman et al, 2003;Muehlenkamp et al, 2005 Osman et al, (2002) study. In addition, PANSI had good criterion validity whereby the mean score of PANSI-negative was significantly higher among psychiatric patients compared to medical patients.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…The findings of the factor structure and psychometric properties of PANSI were consistent with the findings of Western literatures (Osman, Gutierrez, Kopper, Barrios & Chiros, 1998;Osman et al, 2002;Osman et al, 2003;Muehlenkamp, Gutierrez, Osman & Barrios, 2005), which supported the two factor oblique model maintaining 14 items from the original scale. In addition, the findings of the factor structure and psychometric properties of SWLS were also consistent with the findings of Western literatures that supported the unidimensional factor model (Swami & Chamorro-Premuzic, 2009;Anaby et al 2010;Arrindel et al 1999;Atienza et al 2003;Oishi, 2006) maintaining all the 5 items in the original scale.…”

Section: Implications For Suicidal Behavior Assessment In Malaysiasupporting

confidence: 88%

A controlled trial of individual cognitive behavior therapy for unipolar mood disorders with suicidal ideation outpatients: exploring risk and protective factors

Sinniah¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This thesis had two major aims: the first was aimed to test the efficacy of an Individual Cognitive Behavior Therapy for treatment of unipolar mood disorders with suicidal behavior and the second was to evaluate the risk and protective factors for suicidal behavior among patients with unipolar mood disorders in Malaysia. A review of literature on suicidal behavior in Malaysia suggested that lack of suicidal behavior-related measurements has been hindrance in identification of the risk and protective factors for suicidal behaviors. In addition, the investigation of variables that predicts treatment outcomes for patients with unipolar mood disorders with suicidal behavior has also been Confirmatory Factor Analyses were used to examine the psychometric properties and to establish the reliability and validity of these instruments. These measures were validated using the sample size of 483 from both medical and psychiatry patients. All the measures were found to have good reliability and validity using the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.Chapter 7 compared the two groups and the results showed that psychiatry patients had significantly higher mean scores on risk factors (hopelessness, psychological distress, depressive, anxiety and stress symptoms) and lower mean scores on protective factors (reasons for living, self esteem, hopefulness, satisfaction with life and social support) for suicidal behavior as compared to medical patients. In addition, patients with suicidal ideation had significantly higher mean scores on risk factors and lower mean scores on protective factors for suicidal behavior as compared to patients iii without suicidal ideation. And finally, there was a significant interaction between diagnosis (psychiatry patients with suicidal ideation, psychiatry patients without suicidal ideation, medical patients with suicidal ideation and medical patients without suicidal ideation) and suicidal behavior (suicidal ideation).Chapter 8 is a controlled trial comparing the Treatment As Usual (TAU) (N=36) DASS-D, BHS-T, DASS-A, DASS-S) and measures of protective factors for suicidal behavior (RFL-T, RSE-T, AHTS-T, PRS-T, SWLS-T, PSR-FR, PSR-FM, SCB, MO, RF, FS, FSD, and CC)were administered at pre, mid, post, 3 months follow-up and 6 months follow-up for both groups.The TAU groups received outpatient treatment as usual by the psychiatrists of the hospital. The results showed that the TAU+ICBT groups consistently and significantly scored better on most of measures when compared to the TAU group. In addition, the TAU+ICBT group improved at earlier stage and the rate of improvement was significantly faster than the TAU group. The TAU group had significant improvement on seven dependent measures only. Thus the addition of the ICBT to TAU produced a more generalized and significant improvement on all the measures of depressive symptoms, measures of suicide ideation symptoms, measures of risk and protective factors of unipolar mood disordered with suicidal ideation patients.The general discussion o...

show abstract

“…The Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSS) [26] and the Positive and Negative Suicide Ideation Inventory (PANSI) [27] are validated suicide assessment tools [28]. The BSS is a self-report measure with a 19-item scale preceded by five screening items.…”

Section: Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

An overview of traumatic brain injury and suicide

Wasserman

Shaw

et al. 2008

Brain Injury

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper concludes that increasing awareness of depression and suicide risk assessment in the TBI population should be aimed towards staff involved in neuro-rehabilation as well as other professionals who are involved in the care of patients with TBI, because psychoeducation of those most likely to come in contact with at-risk individuals have been shown to increase identification of suicidal patients, lowering suicide rates.

show abstract

Validation of the Positive and Negative Suicide Ideation (PANSI) Inventory in a diverse sample of young adults

Cited by 65 publications

References 44 publications

Effects of Socially Prescribed Expectations on Emotions and Cognitions in Asian and European Americans

Effects of Socially Prescribed Expectations on Emotions and Cognitions in Asian and European Americans

A controlled trial of individual cognitive behavior therapy for unipolar mood disorders with suicidal ideation outpatients: exploring risk and protective factors

An overview of traumatic brain injury and suicide

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About