1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00800.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the quality of life scale: living with HIV

Abstract: A grounded theory of Salvaging Quality of Life provided the conceptual framework for the development of the Living with HIV scale which was validated in this study. The HIV + convenience sample (n = 187) was 66% male, with a mean age of 40.6 years, 69% African-American, and with an average CD4 count of 229 mm3. A principal components factor analysis with varimax rotation was conducted on the final 32-item scale and nine factors with Eigenvalues > 1 explained 60% of the variance. A second order factor analysis … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…48 Questions addressed the presence and frequency of signs and symptoms associated with depression with higher scores indicating the presence of more depressive symptoms (Cronbach ␣ ϭ 0.88-0.90). 49,50 The Living with HIV Scale is a 32-item scale developed by Holzemer et al 51 to measure health-related quality of life in persons with HIV/AIDS based on an earlier study by Wilson et al 52 This scale contains two subscales: a Reverence subscale and a Struggles subscale. Cronbach ␣ reliability was found to be 0.84 by Holzemer et al 51 and 0.83 for this study.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…48 Questions addressed the presence and frequency of signs and symptoms associated with depression with higher scores indicating the presence of more depressive symptoms (Cronbach ␣ ϭ 0.88-0.90). 49,50 The Living with HIV Scale is a 32-item scale developed by Holzemer et al 51 to measure health-related quality of life in persons with HIV/AIDS based on an earlier study by Wilson et al 52 This scale contains two subscales: a Reverence subscale and a Struggles subscale. Cronbach ␣ reliability was found to be 0.84 by Holzemer et al 51 and 0.83 for this study.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49,50 The Living with HIV Scale is a 32-item scale developed by Holzemer et al 51 to measure health-related quality of life in persons with HIV/AIDS based on an earlier study by Wilson et al 52 This scale contains two subscales: a Reverence subscale and a Struggles subscale. Cronbach ␣ reliability was found to be 0.84 by Holzemer et al 51 and 0.83 for this study. 44 The Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form 36, developed by Ware and Sherbourne 53 contains eight subscales that measure physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes a diagnosis of AIDS influences the patient's self-perception of what is important for him or her, and surprisingly, some patients experience a better QOL compared with their lives before the disease (Holzemer, Spicer, Wilson, Kemppainen, & Coleman, 1998). In most cases, however, as the QOL worsens with the progression of HIV infection, psychiatric symptoms, including depression and anxiety, are increasingly observed (Campos, Guimarães, & Remien, 2010;Tostes et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[69][70][71] Our ''older'' samples were also relatively young relative to the mean age in traditional aging literature, and the prevalence and clinical correlates of medical co-morbidity and HRQoL may differ as these older HIV infected individuals reach later decades (e.g., 70s and 80s). Moreover, our older HIV + cohorts were mostly Caucasian, which is likely reflective of larger cohort effects evident in the San Diego County HIV epidemic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%