Validation of the Short Version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale in Korean Police Officers

Song, Jinhee; Kang, Kyonghwa

doi:10.14251/jscm.2023.2.27

Crisis Emergency Manag

2023

DOI: 10.14251/jscm.2023.2.27

|View full text |Cite

Validation of the Short Version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale in Korean Police Officers

Jinhee Song¹,

Kyonghwa Kang²

Abstract: This methodological study verified the validity and reliability of the Conor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), which is used worldwide, for police officers. Data were collected from November 2021 to February 2022 through the Google survey platform from police officers who agreed to follow-up surveys online after participating in the job training course at the Police Human Resources Development Institute. After randomly assigning the collected data to two groups, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Evaluation of reliability generalization of Conner-Davison Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10 and CD-RISC-25): A Meta-analysis

Wojujutari,

Idemudia,

Ugwu

2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Resilience, a critical multi-faceted construct in psychological research, is often measured using Conner-Davison Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10 and CD-RISC-25). This reliability generalization (RG) meta-analysis delves into evaluate the level of reliability generalization estimate of both CD-RISC-10 and CD-RISC-25 in assessing resilience across diverse populations and settings. Methods A reliability generalization meta-analysis on the psychometric properties of CD-RISC-10 and CD-RISC-25 was conducted, encompassing 27 studies. The original versions’ psychometric properties were systematically retrieved from databases including PubMed, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Scopus, with a focus on studies published between 2018 and 2023. The study protocol, including the specific methods for the reliability generalization meta-analysis, was pre-registered in the Prospero database (registration number CRD42023479052). This pre-registration ensures transparency and minimizes the risk of bias in the study design and analysis. Results The analysis revealed a combined estimated overall estimate of Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.89 (95% CI [0.87, 0.91], z = 77.20, p < 0.05), indicating a high level of reliability for CD-RISC-10 and CD-RISC-25. CD-RISC-10 exhibited an overall estimate of Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.8732 (95% CI [0.85, 0.10], z = 69.81, p < 0.05), indicating a high level of reliability, while CD-RISC-25 also demonstrated an overall estimate of Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.8922 (95% CI [0.87, 0.91], z = 77.20, p < 0.001), indicating a high level of reliability. Furthermore, CD-RISC-10 displayed commendable reliability (ωα+ = 0.86), slightly lower compared to the impressive reliability of CD-RISC-25 (ωα+ = 0.89), with a significant difference (t = 0.1159, p > 0.001). The mixed-effects model revealed a non-significant moderating effect of the CD-RISC language version on reliability estimates (coefficient = -0.0017, p <0.05). Conclusion The results affirm the high overall reliability of both CD-RISC-10 and CD-RISC-25, with CD-RISC-25 exhibiting a slightly superior level. The non-significant moderating effect of language version suggests that the psychometric properties of these scales remain robust across different linguistic adaptations. These findings enhance our understanding of the CD-RISC scales, providing practitioners, researchers, and clinicians valuable insights for informed scale selection in diverse contexts. The commendable reliability of both scales underscores their utility in assessing and promoting resilience across varied populations and settings. Future research should explore specific contexts, demographics, and applications, enhancing their utility for diverse populations and settings.

show abstract

Evaluation of reliability generalization of Conner-Davison Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10 and CD-RISC-25): A Meta-analysis

Wojujutari,

Idemudia,

Ugwu

2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Validation of the Short Version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale in Korean Police Officers

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Evaluation of reliability generalization of Conner-Davison Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10 and CD-RISC-25): A Meta-analysis

Evaluation of reliability generalization of Conner-Davison Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10 and CD-RISC-25): A Meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About