Validation of the Spanish version of the care process self-evaluation tool

Camacho-Bejarano, Rafaela; Mariscal-Crespo, María-Isabel; Sermeus, Walter; Vanhaecht, Kris; Navarro, Dolores Merino

doi:10.1258/jicp.2012.012m03

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It serves to identify the expected impact of the ICP on its process outcomes. It has been shown to be an effective tool for improving the performance of a multiprofessional, multidisciplinary team and is available in Dutch (original), English, French, Spanish, and Norwegian [212627]. The content, face, construct, and criterion validity and the reliability of this tool are excellent and have been described elsewhere [21].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient and Health Care Professional Perspectives: A Case Study of the Lung Cancer Integrated Care Pathway

Bravi¹,

Ruscio²,

Frassoldati³

et al. 2018

International Journal of Integrated Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perception of the quality of care, considering both patient experience and health care professionals’ perceptions as well as patient outcome measures of an integrated lung cancer pathway.Methods:A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2016 at Ferrara University Hospital, Italy. OPportunity for Treatment In ONcology (OPTION) questionnaires were administered to 77 patients, and the Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool (CPSET) questionnaires were given to 38 health care professionals. The effectiveness of the pathway was evaluated by analysing the tool’s positive impact on lung cancer surgery volume and 30-day mortality.Results:Seventy-seven patients were enrolled, and 38 health care professionals assessed the CPSET questionnaire. The highest scores were related to “respect” (100%), “satisfaction” (98.7%), and “trust” (97.4%) on the OPTION and to “patient-focused vision” (97.2%) and “patient engagement” (94.4%) on the CPSET. The lowest scores were related to “information” (26%) and “cooperation with general practitioner” (17.6%) on the OPTION and “cooperation between the hospital and primary care” (23.5%) for the CPSET. The outcomes analysis shows an increase in the volume of activity and a decrease in 30-day mortality after pathway implementation.Discussion:The lung cancer pathway is a patient-centred intervention that enables care to be shaped for patient needs in order to improve the quality and efficiency of service and clinical outcome.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient and Health Care Professional Perspectives: A Case Study of the Lung Cancer Integrated Care Pathway

Bravi¹,

Ruscio²,

Frassoldati³

et al. 2018

International Journal of Integrated Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The form is used in several European countries (30,31), and is currently being tested in The health care worker gives a score for each statement using an ordinal scale from 1 to 10, where 1 means 'totally disagree' and 10 means 'totally agree'.…”

Section: The Cpset Questionnairementioning

confidence: 99%

Organiseringa av 22 pasientforløp i Helse Vest

Biringer¹,

Størkson²,

Hartveit³

et al. 2017

Sykepleien

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool

Størkson

Biringer

Hartveit

et al. 2016

Journal of Interprofessional Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool (CPSET) assesses key characteristics of well-organised care processes in hospitals from an interprofessional team perspective. The present study investigated the psychometric properties of the CPSET in terms of factor structure, convergent and discriminant validity, and reliability in Norwegian language and context. After a pilot test, the Norwegian version of the questionnaire was administered as a web form to 501 health professionals in public general hospitals and mental health specialist services; 301 completed forms (response rate 60%) were returned, and 268 (54%) forms representing 27 care processes (19 from somatic care and 8 from mental healthcare) were included in the valid sample. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed the original five-factor structure. All model fit indices, including the standardised root mean square residual (SRMR), which is independent of the χ-test, met the criteria for an acceptable model fit. Internal consistencies within sub-scales as measured by Cronbach's alpha were high (range 0.83-0.94). As expected, some redundancy between factors existed (in particular among the PO (Patient-focused organisation), COR (Coordination of the care process), COM (Communication with patient and family), and PO (Follow-up of the care process) factors). In conclusion, the Norwegian CPSET scale showed acceptable psychometric properties in terms of convergent validity and reliability, and fit indices from the CFA confirmed the original factor structure. Based on these findings, we recommend the Norwegian version of the CPSET for use in the assessment of interprofessional teamwork in care processes in specialist healthcare.

show abstract

Validation of the Spanish version of the care process self-evaluation tool

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Patient and Health Care Professional Perspectives: A Case Study of the Lung Cancer Integrated Care Pathway

Patient and Health Care Professional Perspectives: A Case Study of the Lung Cancer Integrated Care Pathway

Organiseringa av 22 pasientforløp i Helse Vest

Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About