2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-020-01646-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Spanish version of the migraine disability assessment questionnaire (MIDAS) in university students with migraine

Abstract: Background: The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire is widely used to determine the degree of migraine-related disability of subjects. So far, and to the best of our knowledge, no Spanish version of this tool has been validated. The questionnaire comprises seven items, with the first five constituting the main scale while the sixth and seventh items referring, respectively, to the frequency and intensity of headache. The present study aims to analyze the clinimetric properties of the Spanish v… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…"On a scale of 0 to 10, on average how painful were these headaches? (where 0 = no pain at all, and 10 = pain as bad as it can be)" undergraduate and graduate students diagnosed as having migraine [39]. For other versions with one translator for each process, or without mentioning the process, the Japanese version was tested for criterion validity with diary-based measures with a correlation coefficient of 0.36-0.66 for the 5 questions individual and of 0.66 for MIDAS total score and test-retest reliability with Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.59-0.80 for the 5 individual questions and of 0.83 for MIDAS total score in 99 people with headache, and just more than half of them (50.5%) were diagnosed with migraine at a neurological department and an affiliated clinic [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"On a scale of 0 to 10, on average how painful were these headaches? (where 0 = no pain at all, and 10 = pain as bad as it can be)" undergraduate and graduate students diagnosed as having migraine [39]. For other versions with one translator for each process, or without mentioning the process, the Japanese version was tested for criterion validity with diary-based measures with a correlation coefficient of 0.36-0.66 for the 5 questions individual and of 0.66 for MIDAS total score and test-retest reliability with Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.59-0.80 for the 5 individual questions and of 0.83 for MIDAS total score in 99 people with headache, and just more than half of them (50.5%) were diagnosed with migraine at a neurological department and an affiliated clinic [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sum of the score of the first five items provides the degree of headache-related disability while the sixth and seventh items indicate the frequency and intensity of migraine, respectively. This questionnaire presented excellent reliability values for the main scale (ICC = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.63-0.90; p < 0.001) and for headache frequency (ICC = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.79-0.95; p < 0.001), and good results for headache intensity (ICC = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.34-0.80; p < 0.001) as well as good internal consistency results (Cronbach's alpha = 0.797) [19].…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The presence/absence of a migraine was determined through the medical diagnosis made at the beginning of the study. The degree of migraine-related disability as a way to estimate the personal impact of a migraine in terms of lost useful time as well as the frequency and intensity of a migraine, two of the most important criteria for a headache diagnosis, were estimated through the Spanish version of the Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire [19]. Seven items compose this instrument: the first five items focus on three dimensions of daily life that can be affected by headaches while the other two items refer to the frequency and intensity of headaches.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sum of the scores of the first five items provides the degree of disability related to the headache, while the sixth and seventh items indicate the frequency and intensity of the headache, respectively. The Spanish version of the questionnaire has good reliability and validity properties [33].…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sleep quality was also included as a predictor variable, due to the relationship that has been reported between the perception of verticality and the variables related to sleep [35]. To measure Headache-related disability as well as its frequency and intensity were assessed using the Spanish version of the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire [33]. This instrument is made up of seven items, the first five of which focus on three dimensions of daily life that can be affected by headaches while the remaining two items refer to the frequency and intensity of the headache.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%