2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the SQUASH Physical Activity Questionnaire in a Multi-Ethnic Population: The HELIUS Study

Abstract: PurposeTo investigate the reliability and validity of the SQUASH physical activity (PA) questionnaire in a multi-ethnic population living in the Netherlands.MethodsWe included participants from the HELIUS study, a population-based cohort study. In this study we included Dutch (n = 114), Turkish (n = 88), Moroccan (n = 74), South-Asian Surinamese (n = 98) and African Surinamese (n = 91) adults, aged 18–70 years. The SQUASH was self-administered twice to assess test-re-test reliability (mean interval 6–7 weeks) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible limitation of this study might be the presence of selection bias, as only a selection of the HELIUS participants might have been willing to participate in this particular sub-study. Non-responder analyses indeed showed differences in BMI, gender, and migration generation between responders and non-responders in the sub-study [ 10 ]. More specifically, it is possible that more active and less sedentary participants were willing to participate in this sub-study and wear the Actiheart monitor, causing the ethnic groups in the study to be more homogenous than in real life, possibly concealing existing differences in the prevalence of sedentary time between the ethnic groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One possible limitation of this study might be the presence of selection bias, as only a selection of the HELIUS participants might have been willing to participate in this particular sub-study. Non-responder analyses indeed showed differences in BMI, gender, and migration generation between responders and non-responders in the sub-study [ 10 ]. More specifically, it is possible that more active and less sedentary participants were willing to participate in this sub-study and wear the Actiheart monitor, causing the ethnic groups in the study to be more homogenous than in real life, possibly concealing existing differences in the prevalence of sedentary time between the ethnic groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that this resulted in more valid and better comparable levels of sedentary time than self-report measures, as self-report measures suffer from recall and social desirability bias and possible linguistic and cultural differences in the interpretation of the questions. The latter might be an especially important consideration in research focussed on differences between cultures or ethnicities, even though Nicolaou and colleagues did not find ethnic differences in the reliability and validity of the SQUASH questionnaire when compared to the Actiheart monitor [ 10 ]. Nevertheless, objective measures such as the Actiheart lack contextual and domain specific information, which might have concealed ethnic differences in sedentary time domains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, low test–retest reliability was found for the SQUASH in all groups, implying no valid basis for the comparison of physical activity between the different ethnic groups. 21 …”
Section: Cohort Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, recall bias could thus have led to an overestimation of the diet and physical activity behaviour of the study population. Additionally, the SQUASH questionnaire is known to overestimate the physical activity that participants conduct, which could have caused an overestimation of the physical activity of vocational students (54). The exact effect that these possible overestimations might have had on the found associations cannot be inferred.…”
Section: Limitations Strengths and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 94%