2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the targeted axillary dissection technique in the axillary staging of breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: Preliminary results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of SNB following NAC for patients with cN1 breast cancer is controversial because clinical trials have shown that the FNR exceeds the prespecified threshold of 10% [3][4][5] . To decrease FNR, dual-agent mapping, examining more than two sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) [3][4][5]7 , targeted axillary dissection (TAD) placement including MARI, and tattooing procedure have been suggested [8][9][10][11][12] . When limited to patients with more than two SLNs removed, the FNR was 7.3% and 9.1% in the SENTINA and ACOSOG Z1071 trails, respectively 3,4 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of SNB following NAC for patients with cN1 breast cancer is controversial because clinical trials have shown that the FNR exceeds the prespecified threshold of 10% [3][4][5] . To decrease FNR, dual-agent mapping, examining more than two sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) [3][4][5]7 , targeted axillary dissection (TAD) placement including MARI, and tattooing procedure have been suggested [8][9][10][11][12] . When limited to patients with more than two SLNs removed, the FNR was 7.3% and 9.1% in the SENTINA and ACOSOG Z1071 trails, respectively 3,4 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using currently available data 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , the AGO has evaluated the following procedures to reduce false negative rates during the surgical staging of cases who are pN+ CNB before NACT and ycN0 after NACT with AGO + ( Fig. 1 ):…”
Section: Surgical Management Of the Axilla After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basierend auf der derzeitigen Datenlage 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 bewertet die AGO folgende Verfahren zur Verringerung der Falsch-negativ-Rate des operativen Stagings bei pN+ CNB vor NACT und ycN0 nach NACT mit AGO + ( Abb. 1 ):…”
Section: Empfehlung Der Ago Kommission Mamma Zur Verringerung Der Falsch-negativ-rate Des Operativen Stagings Bei Stanzbioptisch Gesicherunclassified
“…It is worth mentioning that some researchers do not specifically report the FNR according to N status (N1, N2, etc. ), but rather grant an overall FNR of 0% for all N statuses [10, 15, 17, 19]. This indirectly suggests that, for patients with axillary disease >N1, the FNR of TAD is still 0%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%