Validation of the Urban Walkability Perception Questionnaire (UWPQ) in the Balearic Islands

Abstract

Within the context of promoting the “healthy routes” program, the aim of this study was to validate the urban walkability perception questionnaire (UWPQ) in the Balearic Islands to determine the characteristics of the urban environment that promote walking among the population. The UWPQ measures pedestrian facilities, infrastructures of the environment, perception of safety and a participant’s general opinion. This process was performed in 12 routes predefined by a community participation program and set around the primary health centers. Degree of correlation between the items was calculated. The final internal consistency was 0.8 in all blocks according to the Cronbach's alpha test (p < 0.01). Goodman and Kruskal–gamma correlation coefficient (γ) between the item measuring the general opinion and the rest of the items was significant. The items from the perception of safety and pedestrian facilities blocks were the ones that most affected the final assessment. Those regarding the pedestrianonly pavements, clearly marked pavements, noise, traffic density and parks condition obtained the lowest coefficients. To conclude, the results showed that the UWPQ is a suitable instrument to assess the degree of adequacy of the urban environment for walking. It could contribute to create healthy environments as well as to improve public policies.

Road Safety Perception Questionnaire (RSPQ) in Latin America: A Development and Validation Study

“…The RSPQ used a matrix item structure and the response options a five-point Likert scale [ 67 , 68 ], with a rating of: 1 = very low, 2 = low, 3 = medium, 4 = high and 5 = very high. The questionnaires were applied individually and anonymously by previously trained surveyors.…”

“…To assess the reliability of the questionnaire, Cronbach’s alpha [ 81 ], was used, evaluating only in terms of internal consistency as suggested by [ 65 , 67 ], applying the item covariance method of the dimensions applied to the Likert scale questions from the RSPQ data applied to 736 drivers. After showing the validity of the questionnaire, its reliability was also shown by Cronbach’s alpha [ 82 ], for which 0.80 is considered a good score and 0.90 is excellent [ 83 ].…”

AI-Based Evaluation of Streets for People in Bangkok: Perspectives from Walkability and Lingerability

“…There are also varying perspectives when evaluating the level of walkability. For subjective evaluation, common methods include questionnaires and interviews to gauge pedestrians' subjective perceptions of the built environment [33][34][35][36][37]. Gorrini et al conducted a qualitative walkability assessment of Venice's historic center by utilizing open data from public agencies and on-site observations, revealing that a lack of essential services, tourist crowds, and insufficient signage affect walkability [38].…”