2019
DOI: 10.35119/asjoo.v16i4.402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the WINROP screening algorithm among preterm infants in East Malaysia

Abstract: Objective: To prospectively validate the WINROP (Weight, Insulin-like growth factor 1, Neonatal, Retinopathy of Prematurity) screening algorithm (www.winrop.com) based on longitudinal measurements of neonatal body weights in predicting the development of severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) among preterm infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary care center in East Malaysia. Methods: All premature infants of less than 32 weeks gestational age (GA) were included in this cohort.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The full text was read for eligibility, of which 61 were included in the final analysis. The 61 studies (>37 000 infants) included WINROP (n = 36), 6 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 G-ROP (n = 9), 7 , 42 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 PINT ROP (n = 1), 8 CHOP ROP (n = 6), 9 , 30 , 55 , 62 , 63 , 64 ROPScore (n = 5), 10 , 30 , 55 , 65 , 66 and CO-ROP (n = 4). 11 , 67 , 68 , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The full text was read for eligibility, of which 61 were included in the final analysis. The 61 studies (>37 000 infants) included WINROP (n = 36), 6 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 G-ROP (n = 9), 7 , 42 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 PINT ROP (n = 1), 8 CHOP ROP (n = 6), 9 , 30 , 55 , 62 , 63 , 64 ROPScore (n = 5), 10 , 30 , 55 , 65 , 66 and CO-ROP (n = 4). 11 , 67 , 68 , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full text was read for eligibility, of which 61 were included in the final analysis. The 61 studies (>37 000 infants) included WINROP (n = 36), G-ROP (n = 9), PINT ROP (n = 1), CHOP ROP (n = 6), ROPScore (n = 5), and CO-ROP (n = 4) . Studies that used a different cutoff score for ROPScore were not included in the analysis …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations