2010
DOI: 10.1136/ip.2009.022681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of two child passenger safety questionnaires

Abstract: Both the booster seat questionnaire and the car seat questionnaire are valid and can be reliably used in future studies. The findings of this study need to be verified with larger studies and different populations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Survey topics were selected to expand on qualitative themes gathered from the focus group data, such as caregivers’ role in the installation process, parents’ assessment of perceived risks and benefits of installing a car seat correctly, parents’ attitudes about current resources available to help install a car seat, and parents’ values regarding content and features that could be included in a mobile app to guide CRS installation. Survey items addressing these topics were adapted from other validated CPS measures in the literature [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. To establish content validity of the instrument, a panel of CPS and mobile app design experts from the Center for Injury Research and Prevention at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Safe Kids Worldwide, and Drexel University Applied Informatics Groups (N = 5) reviewed and offered suggestions for revision.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Survey topics were selected to expand on qualitative themes gathered from the focus group data, such as caregivers’ role in the installation process, parents’ assessment of perceived risks and benefits of installing a car seat correctly, parents’ attitudes about current resources available to help install a car seat, and parents’ values regarding content and features that could be included in a mobile app to guide CRS installation. Survey items addressing these topics were adapted from other validated CPS measures in the literature [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. To establish content validity of the instrument, a panel of CPS and mobile app design experts from the Center for Injury Research and Prevention at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Safe Kids Worldwide, and Drexel University Applied Informatics Groups (N = 5) reviewed and offered suggestions for revision.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is concern that safety behaviors may be overestimated, there is data to support that selfreports of ownership of a car seat are reliable. 16,17 There is an inexact match between the SNS questions and E-codes. As a pilot study there was not enough power in the current number of patients screened and injured to establish statistical significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire used was developed specifically for this study by members of the research team familiar with Kuwaiti safety laws and culture, by seeking relevant survey tools in the literature (e.g., Hernandez, B., 2008;Snowdon et al, 2009;Uherick, Gorelick, Biechler, Brixey, & Melzer-Lange, 2010) and then adapting or generating items to better address the local situation and the research objectives. The questionnaire was pilot tested with 25 adults from the general population.…”
Section: Survey Tool Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%