2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation studies of turbulence closure schemes for high resolutions in mesoscale meteorological models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the mixing of the tracer is much more effective in the case of the similarity approaches, which results in lower predicted concentrations. This relatively poor performance of the level-2.5 closure was also pointed out by Trini Castelli et al (2006), who compared turbulence closure models for different stability conditions in complex terrain, and attributed the TKE underestimation of the level-2.5 closure to its onedimensional approach. The PBL height difference is due to the fact that, in the case of the "SIM" and "SIM-ct" methods, the bulk Richardson number is used to determine the height of the PBL, while the "Direct" approach is inherently related to the TKE profile of the COSMO model itself.…”
Section: Initial Soil Moisturementioning
confidence: 86%
“…Consequently, the mixing of the tracer is much more effective in the case of the similarity approaches, which results in lower predicted concentrations. This relatively poor performance of the level-2.5 closure was also pointed out by Trini Castelli et al (2006), who compared turbulence closure models for different stability conditions in complex terrain, and attributed the TKE underestimation of the level-2.5 closure to its onedimensional approach. The PBL height difference is due to the fact that, in the case of the "SIM" and "SIM-ct" methods, the bulk Richardson number is used to determine the height of the PBL, while the "Direct" approach is inherently related to the TKE profile of the COSMO model itself.…”
Section: Initial Soil Moisturementioning
confidence: 86%
“…For instance, Trini Castelli et al (2001; and Ferrero et al (2003) implemented and evaluated turbulence closure schemes of different orders in the Regional Atmospheric Modelling System (RAMS: Pielke et al, 1992), for simulation of both flow and dispersion in a case-study of a tracer experiment performed in a wind tunnel over a schematic two-dimensional valley. RAMS closures have been modified and tested also for simulations of circulation and dispersion in a complex terrain site on the Japanese coast (Trini Castelli et al, 2006;Hara et al, 2009) and in presence of obstacles over flat terrain . The turbulence parametrizations in the planetary boundary-layer scheme have been thoroughly assessed for the WRF mesoscale model (Weather Research and Forecasting: Skamarock and Klemp, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%