Validation study of the Italian brief version of the multidimensional jealousy scale: Psychometric properties, measurement invariance across gender, and convergent validity

Abstract

IntroductionThe multidimensional jealousy scale (MJS) is among the most internationally used instruments for the assessment of jealousy in its three dimensions: cognitive, emotional, and behavioral. This study aimed to replicate the Italian validation process of the shortened MJS in order to confirm its psychometric properties and measurement invariance across gender.Materials and methodsExploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted in a large sample of adults (n = 2,928). To reliably estimate mean differences across gender, the measurement invariance of the scale was first established by means of CFA. Convergent validity was than tested by administrating the tool to a convenient sample (n = 304).ResultsA 15-item version of the Italian MJS was retained in its three-factor structure. The tool showed good fit with both the CFA (χ2 = 211.827, CFI = 0.969, TLI = 0.959, RMSEA = 0.047, RMSEA 90% CI = 0.039–0.055) and the results confirmed the strong measurement invariance of the MJS across gender. The internal consistency measures were found to be fully satisfactory. Predictive associations with constructs such as avoidance and anxiety referred to attachment in relationships (ECR-R), obsessive jealousy, depressive jealousy, jealousy associated with separation anxiety, paranoid jealousy (QUEGE), and basic self-esteem (BSE) were confirmed.DiscussionThe MJS is particularly apt to collect information quickly and efficiently about jealousy in a current relationship. The multidimensional and brief structure makes it particularly suitable for preliminary screening, couple therapy assessment, and research purposes.

Exploring the Accuracy and Consistency of a School Readiness Assessment Tool for Preschoolers: Reliability, Validity and Measurement Invariance Analysis

“…Further analysis of the CFA models revealed good item-factor correlation coefficients, indicating close relationships between the items and the underlying factors of both the dichotomous and rating tests. This finding supports the development of robust constructs for both tests by CFA measures (Diotaiuti et al 2022;Liu et al 2020). Consequently, it can be inferred that the DIFER test successfully captures the multidimensional nature of school readiness, lending further support to its construct validity.…”

“…However, for such studies to yield meaningful and comparable results, it is imperative that the measurement instruments used possess measurement invariance. (Diotaiuti et al 2022). By establishing measurement invariance, researchers gain confidence in comparing and interpreting analytical outcomes, such as latent means, across distant groups and different timeframes (Gygi et al 2016).…”

The influence of insecure attachment on undergraduates’ jealousy: the mediating effect of self-differentiation

“…This Result is consistent with Costa et al (2015) and Richter et al (2022). Diotaiuit and colleagues conducted a validation study of the Italian version of the multidimensional jealousy scale, which showed that anxiety and jealousy were positively correlated and supported this study (Diotaiuti et al, 2022). According to attachment theory, individuals with attachment anxiety fear abandonment.…”

Measurement Invariance of the Multidimensional Jealousy Scale and Quality of Relationships Inventory (Friend)

“…The Portuguese version demonstrated strong internal consistency across all sub-dimensions, with Cronbach's alpha values of 0.92 for cognitive jealousy, 0.86 for emotional jealousy, 0.90 for behavioral jealousy, and 0.86 for the total scale. This instrument has been validated for different populations, including the Urdu population [26], Italian population [27], Iranian population [28], Serbian population [29], and Australian population [30].…”