Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos de un instrumento para medir percepciones físico-emocionales en la práctica de disección anatómica

Content Validation through Expert Judgement of an Instrument on the Nutritional Knowledge, Beliefs, and Habits of Pregnant Women

“…For the questionnaire analyzed, the Fleiss' κ statistic yielded an "almost perfect" strength of agreement for each dimension and a strength of agreement between "substantial" and "almost perfect" for pairs of experts. Similar results were obtained by Bernal-García et al [54]. However, in this study, the strength of agreement by pairs of experts attained a somewhat lower level, between "moderate" and "almost perfect".…”

“…In these studies, in addition to the expert phase, the instrument designed is subsequently subjected to a pre-test where a focus group assesses each item for clarity taking into account the level of understandability of the instrument [53]. Similarly, in a study by Bernal-García et al [54] a pre-test was subsequently conducted to measure the degree of understandability of the instrument, which turned out to be high-ranking, as in this study.…”

Content Validation of an Instrument for the Assessment of School Teachers’ Levels of Knowledge of Diabetes through Expert Judgment

“…According to [ 17 ], these other characteristics in the selection of the judges are their experience, their academic and scientific reputation, their availability, and their motivation to participate, but most importantly, their honesty and commitment regarding these characteristics. Judges with the aforementioned criteria participated in this study in order to avoid introducing content bias in the data analysis [ 36 ].…”

“…In addition, to ensure validity, in addition to the set of experts, it is very useful to include non-specialists, mainly individuals from the reference population [ 50 ]. In the present study, 114 university students from the Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences at the Melilla Campus of the University of Granada, Spain, all of them future school teachers, voluntarily participated in the pre-test, in a similar way to what [ 36 ] described in their study. As in the case of their study, the degree of comprehensibility of the GCDDaE questionnaire was found to be high (91.54%).…”

“…The validation process was applied to a 33-item questionnaire built on the basis of the 24 items that make up the diabetes knowledge questionnaire (DKQ-24) [ 34 ], an instrument that was designed to assess general knowledge of diabetes in individuals in accordance with the content recommendations of the U.S. National Standards for Diabetes Patient Education Programs [ 35 ], plus 9 newly created items to complement the different aspects under study, such as knowledge of complications and knowledge of diabetic patient care ( Appendix A ). These 9 items were prepared based on the literature review conducted using the Web of Science database taking into account the classical test theory [ 36 ].…”