2015
DOI: 10.1002/pds.3877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and completeness of colorectal cancer diagnoses in a primary care database in the United Kingdom

Abstract: PurposeTo validate the recorded diagnoses of colorectal cancer (CRC) and identify false negatives in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) primary care database.MethodsWe conducted a validation study of incident CRC cases in THIN among patients aged 40–89 years from 2000–2011. CRC Read code entries (N = 3805) were verified by manual review of patients' electronic medical records (EMRs) including free‐text comments. Incident CRC cases in THIN ascertained following manual review were validated against two data s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cancer incidence in THIN is similar to the incidence in the UK Quality Outcomes Framework data (13), and to the UK Office for National Statistics' Cancer Registration Statistics (18,19). Previous studies have assessed the positive predictive values (PPV) of specific cancer diagnosis codes in THIN and found a PPV of 94% for bladder cancer (20) and a PPV of 89% for colorectal cancer (21).…”
Section: Cancermentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The cancer incidence in THIN is similar to the incidence in the UK Quality Outcomes Framework data (13), and to the UK Office for National Statistics' Cancer Registration Statistics (18,19). Previous studies have assessed the positive predictive values (PPV) of specific cancer diagnosis codes in THIN and found a PPV of 94% for bladder cancer (20) and a PPV of 89% for colorectal cancer (21).…”
Section: Cancermentioning
confidence: 63%
“…31, 34, 35 The incidence of cancer in THIN was shown to be valid compared to cancer registry data in the entire population of the UK. 54, 55 In an additional study the PPV for incidence PDA identified using Read codes in THIN was 97% based on manual chart review, further supporting the validity of PDA diagnosis in THIN. 56 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Further details about the database are described elsewhere. [ 12 , 13 ] At the time the study was carried out, approximately one fifth of practices contributing to THIN were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) [ 14 ], thus information from secondary care could be obtained for individuals in these practices.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%