Validity and predictors of BMI derived from self-reported height and weight among 11- to 17-year-old German adolescents from the KiGGS study

Abstract

BackgroundFor practical and financial reasons, self-reported instead of measured height and weight are often used. The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity of self-reports and to identify potential predictors of the validity of body mass index (BMI) derived from self-reported height and weight.FindingsSelf-reported and measured data were collected from a sub-sample (3,468 adolescents aged 11-17) from the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS). BMI was calculated from both reported and measured values, and these were compared in descriptive analyses. Linear regression models with BMI difference (self-reported minus measured) and logistic regression models with weight status misclassifications as dependent variables were calculated.Height was overestimated by 14- to 17-year-olds. Overall, boys and girls under-reported their weight. On average, BMI values calculated from self-reports were lower than those calculated from measured values. This underestimation of BMI led to a bias in the prevalence rates of under- and overweight which was stronger in girls than in boys. Based on self-reports, the prevalence was 9.7% for underweight and 15.1% for overweight. However, according to measured data the corresponding rates were 7.5% and 17.7%, respectively. Linear regression for BMI difference showed significant differences according to measured weight status: BMI was overestimated by underweight adolescents and underestimated by overweight adolescents. When weight status was excluded from the model, body perception was statistically significant: Adolescents who regarded themselves as 'too fat' underestimated their BMI to a greater extent. Symptoms of a potential eating disorder, sexual maturation, socio-economic status (SES), school type, migration background and parental overweight showed no association with the BMI difference, but parental overweight was a consistent predictor of the misclassification of weight status defined by self-reports.ConclusionsThe present findings demonstrate that the observed discrepancy between self-reported and measured height and weight leads to inaccurate estimates of the prevalence of under- and overweight when based on self-reports. The collection of body perception data and parents' height and weight is therefore recommended in addition to self-reports. Use of a correction formula seems reasonable in order to correct for differences between self-reported and measured data.

Validity of self-reported weight and height: a cross-sectional study among Malaysian adolescents

“…Our findings were in line with previous studies in Korea [21], Greece [22], Portugal [23], Germany [24] and the United States [6, 25]. The consequences of under-reporting weight are overestimation of the prevalence rate of underweight, and underestimation of obesity.…”

Social factors, weight perception, and weight control practices among adolescents in Mexico

“…Other studies have found that adolescents tend to underestimate their BMI, and underestimation is more pronounced among younger adolescents and those with higher BMI. While the magnitude of underestimation is under 1 kg/m 2 in most studies (Brettschneider et al, 2011;Perez et al, 2015;Sherry et al, 2007), one study in China found an underestimation of −1.23 kg/m 2 (Zhou et al, 2010). If some students in our sample were less accurate in their report of weight and height, and they were also different in terms of BWP and WCP, controlling for BMI would be imperfect and the observed associations might be biased.…”

Prevalencia de sobrepeso y obesidad en los niños de 9 y 10 años del Principado de Asturias: el sesgo de la valoración de los padres

“…Del mismo modo, cuando son los jóvenes quienes informan de su peso y altura tienden a subestimar el primero y sobreestimar la segunda 15 .…”