2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16234722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and Reliability of a Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) to Assess Dietary Intake of Preschool Children

Abstract: As there are few food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) to assess the dietary intake of preschool children, this study examined the validity and reliability of an FFQ for this purpose. A total of 210 preschoolers aged 4 to 6 years participated in the validation study, while a subsample of 66 participants joined the reliability study. The FFQ is modified from the ToyBox-study and South East Asian Nutrition Surveys (SEANUTS), and comprised 108 food items from 13 food groups. A three-day estimated dietary record (3D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
23
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
23
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, for apps that function solely as diet trackers, their credibility was assessed primarily through the accuracy of their food databases. A total of 20 food items (ie, four food items per major food group: cereals, protein, vegetables, fruits, and fat), which represent an average number of food items consumed by a person per day [ 27 ], were randomly selected for comparison using cross-classification analysis, which is a widely used method to assess agreement in validation studies involving food nutrients [ 28 , 29 ]. Apps that showed more than 7% gross misclassification [ 30 ] were considered not credible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, for apps that function solely as diet trackers, their credibility was assessed primarily through the accuracy of their food databases. A total of 20 food items (ie, four food items per major food group: cereals, protein, vegetables, fruits, and fat), which represent an average number of food items consumed by a person per day [ 27 ], were randomly selected for comparison using cross-classification analysis, which is a widely used method to assess agreement in validation studies involving food nutrients [ 28 , 29 ]. Apps that showed more than 7% gross misclassification [ 30 ] were considered not credible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the amount of dairy intake was not included in our study. However, the FFQ is valid and with good reliability for assessing preschool children's food intake [54]. Furthermore, the frequency of dairy intake can be recalled by subjects more easily and accurately than the amount of dairy intake and the results can be modifiable for education and intervention design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although one FFQ related to the whole grain intake and adapted to Swiss adults has been published [19], but it might not be suitable for Malaysian children; due to the fact that cultural and preference can show a discrepancy between settings [10]. While FFQs validated for Malaysian children populations were mostly developed to assess general dietary intake [21,32], our FFQ was developed specifically to estimate whole grain intake. Our interview-administered FFQ has potential to minimize any possible bias and mistake, by providing immediate feedback to the children [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%