1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1989.tb02140.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reliability of alveolar bone level measurements made on dry skulls

Abstract: The validity of the radiographic alveolar bone level measurements in relation to direct measurements, and the reliability of both the direct and the radiographic measurements were estimated on dry skulls. The CEJ-AC distances in the proximal areas of teeth in 6 dry skulls were assessed directly, on periapical radiographic films taken with the Eggen film holder only and on films taken with the film holder and a rubber impression material. The validity of the bone level measurements made on films taken by the 2 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0
10

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
31
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This was in accordance with Eickholz P and Albandar et al, study [12,16], where both conventional and direct digital radiographs showed underestimation of bone loss when compared with actual IS bone loss measurements. The results are contradictory to results of Chandrashekaraiah D and Talaiepour AR et al, studies who overestimated the interproximal bone loss measurements in RVG [1,8].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This was in accordance with Eickholz P and Albandar et al, study [12,16], where both conventional and direct digital radiographs showed underestimation of bone loss when compared with actual IS bone loss measurements. The results are contradictory to results of Chandrashekaraiah D and Talaiepour AR et al, studies who overestimated the interproximal bone loss measurements in RVG [1,8].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The mean probing measurements on the mesial and distal sides of maxillary and mandibular premolars and molars in both males and females were comparable with the study of Albander JM 13 but, inconsistent with that of Renvert et al 12 This dissimilarity could be because their sample size was very less containing only 13 periodontally involved subjects and only 33 sites with intraosseous defects (Table 1).…”
Section: Clinical Probingsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…These measurements represented horizontal bone loss, since according to Muller & Perizonius (1980) bone loss reported in ancient skulls is largely horizontal and an average value should be calculated per tooth. A UNC 15 periodontal probe was used to record CEJ-AC measurements (Albandar, 1989) aided by a magnifying lens (3Â) when any doubt arose, and this was especially helpful when the CEJ line was not very perceptible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%